I wish if I can , I want to help
Of little importance and or signifiance
Examples of torture are as follows:
- Electrocution.
- Beatings.
- Sleep deprivation.
- Threat to family members.
<h3>What is torture?</h3>
This is known as the action or practice of inflicting suffering or pain on someone to make them do or say something.
There are several types of punishment, and some of the few are freezing to death and restraint.
Torture can be psychological or mental where victims are exposed to loud noise or solitary confinement for a long period of time which affects them.
Hence, torture can cause harm to the victim and perpetrators as well because they can experience mental health and severe tendencies with physical or mental trauma passed on to their victims.
Read more about<em> torture </em>here:
brainly.com/question/347192
#SPJ1
After reading this except from leo tolstoy’s the death of ivan ilyich I've recognized the sentence which shows that ivan ilyich’s daughter, lisa, does not empathize with her father’s suffering almos in the end of the excerpt. I am pretty sure that this sentence best shows what you need.
"it's as if we were to blame! i am sorry for papa, but why should we be tortured?"
The way Holmes handles the perpetrators of the crimes affect how I view Holmes in a significant way: these examples show that, even with all the characteristics that put Holmes one step ahead of most human being, he is somehow still human, human enough to do something that is not considered right for many, but for him it is. It showed me that Holmes has an integrity I never considered before.
----
For me, it is, as it proves his integrity and also the dedication to his work. He does not want to punish the guilty, instead what really concerns Holmes is the discovery of the truth. In that sense, his mission is admirable.
----
Yes, it is possible to say that he sees himself as “above the law”. Holmes does not care for trivial human conventions, as he displayed on many occasions throughout his career. He believes that his ability and talent are enough to put him above the law.
----
It depends on what it is considered ethical. From his point of view, surely it is ethical. From the point of view of the justice system, it is surely not ethical. From a personal perspective, while I do understand his point of view, I do not consider his behavior ethical.
----
<span>I do consider his behavior ethical because, while he has many talents and abilities, no man should be seen himself as above the law. It takes only one man to consider himself as so to justify every other man to do the same, and so this would led to many men thinking they could do justice on their own. </span>