Answer:
B) 4.76%
Explanation:
total unemployment = 2.5 million all the people currently seeking jobs and 0.5 million those temporarily laid off (and expecting a recall) = 3 million
Econville's total labor force = 40 million full time workers + 20 million part time workers + 3 million unemployed = 63 million
unemployment rate = unemployed / total labor force = (3 million / 63 million) x 100 = 4.76%
The answer is 78 inches.
The instructions indicate that you need to purchase fabric that is the length of the pants, and then double it and add an additional 8 inches. Using these instructions, it is calculated by doubling 35 inches, which is 70 inches, and then add 8 inches to it. This gives you an answer of 78 inches.
Answer: I found the correct and complete question:
Which of the following statements is most CORRECT with respect to international diversification?
a) the gains from diversification may be diminished due to combined correlations accompanied by volatility in world markets. b) world markets always seem to be most uncorrelated when volatility is present. c) world markets have displayed relatively low and fixed correlations over the last five years. d) global diversification produces gain even when world markets have correlations value near one.
Explanation: The correct answer is "a) the gains from diversification may be diminished due to combined correlations accompanied by volatility in world markets.".
Global markets are generally in different phases and many of them are part of weak economies that therefore have a high degree of volatility and some are correlated so that a loss in one of these markets can lead to a loss in another and earnings can be diminished.
Explanation:
Crops and livestock will be subjected to increasing temperatures, increasing CO2, and more variable water availability caused by changing precipitation patterns and access to irrigation. These factors effect plant growth and yield and environmental conditions for livestock production.
Answer:
Martin works as a pizza delivery person. He parks his bike outside Regalia Inc. To deliver an order. Meanwhile, a damaged book rack in Regalia, which is situated on the first floor of the building, falls down through an open window and crashes on his bike. However, no one admits to having seen the rack fall. Can Martin recover against Regalia for negligence?
It is a dicey situation, if Regalia Inc has a parking lots and Martin did not use it rather he just parked at his convenience, then no one will be responsible for such but if he parked at allotted space for bikes and such occurrence happened then Regalia inc will bear the cost and pay for damages.
Explanation: