Answer:
The right approach is Option C (global minimum variance portfolio).
Explanation:
- A completely-invested portfolio with either a low uncertainty factor seems to be the GMV portfolio. This same GMV portfolio corresponds to or is situated mostly on the left end including its FI-efficient frontier.
- Although aside from either the full-investment requirement, no restrictions are enforced, the GMV portfolio deals for analytical portrayal.
The latter options offered are not relevant to something like the scenario presented. So that is indeed the correct solution.
Answer:
D.) $75,000
Explanation:
Amount of revenue recognized = Cost incurred to date / Estimated total cost * Contract price
Cost incurred to date=60,000
Estimated total cost=400,000
Contract price=500,000
Amount of revenue recognized= 60,000/400,000 * 500,000
=0-15 * 500,000
=$75,000
Amount of revenue recognized in year 1 is $75,000
Answer:
WACC for A: 9.05%
WACC for B: 9.50%
WACC for C: 12.20%
WACC for D: 12.65%
Explanation:
WACC for a division will be equal: Percentage of Debt in capital employed by the Division x Cost of Debt + Percentage of Equity in capital employed by the Division x Cost of equity = 50% x 6% + 50% x ( Risk free rate + Beta of each Division x Risk premium) = 3% + 50% x ( 4% + beta of each Division x Risk premium)
Risk premium for the 4 Divisions is equal to (Cost of equity for the whole firm - Risk free rate) / beta = 9%
Thus WACC for a division will be equal: 3% + 50% x ( 4% + beta of each Division x 9%).
Substitute beta of each Division from A to D provided in the question, we have: WACC for A: 9.05%; WACC for B: 9.5%; WACC for C: 12.2%; WACC for D: 12.65%.
Answer: C. inefficiently low; inefficiently high
Explanation:
If the cotton farmers are not made to pay for the damage that their pesticides cost then they will maintain production at a relatively high level because their input costs will be relatively low. As a result of this high level of production, the price of the goods will be relatively low as well. The point at which both market equilibrium quantity and price are at in this scenario are considered inefficient because they are not taking into account, the true cost of production being the effects of the pesticides being used.
However, if they are made to pay for this negative externality that they are the cause of, it will increase their production cost and force them to reduce production to keep these costs low. As they reduce production, the market price will increase as supply is less.
Answer: democratic leadership
Carmen stated a possible solution that was increasing tuition fee and then Carmen said that it should be considered. This means that she did not impose it that that is the only solution and that has to be done in any way, if she did then it would’ve been autocratic leadership.
Carmen left some room for discussion and this means it is a democratic approach in leadership.
