1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iren2701 [21]
3 years ago
12

Peter the Great and Catherine the Great were examples of the positive uses of absolute monarchy. Do you think that they could ha

ve accomplished the same things in a constitutional monarchy?
History
1 answer:
Neporo4naja [7]3 years ago
3 0
I don't believe they could have. In order to accomplish what they did, they needed full control of the situation, without fun control, they would not have made things better for their kingdom.
You might be interested in
The first time that unmanned underwater "gliders" were used by ocean scientists to respond to an oil spill was after the
SSSSS [86.1K]

highland at smithsonian

3 0
3 years ago
The constitutional doctrine that prevents the government from prohibiting speech or publication before the fact and which genera
DedPeter [7]
////prior restraints////
5 0
3 years ago
The relationshin between the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights can be best be summarized as
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

Both the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights were used to express grievances against the British government. ... The Declaration of Independence listed grievances and the Bill of Rights addressed them. The Bill of Rights listed grievances and the Declaration of Independence addressed them.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Did andrew jacksons policies protect the rights<br> of the u.s citizens during his presidency
Semenov [28]
Yes it sure did , hope it helped!
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain how foreign occupation could encourage nationalist sentiment in various colonies
xeze [42]

Foreign occupation gave the nationalists in the country a common cause to unite.

Explanation:

Foreign occupation is a phenomenon that has resulted in many nationalist movements across the world for a long time.

This is because the foreign rule in itself sows the common cause against which the nation can unite itself and then fight  back or throw away with diplomacy their own rulers.

This common cause binds the thread of self determination and rule of the nation under one rule is what is requited for nationalism to rise and it happens here rather strongly.

The people of the nation set aside differences against a common enemy of the state.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is Palestine still a divided land? The Christians and the Arabs both claim it as their own The United Nations would not esta
    8·1 answer
  • Where &amp; how did the United States expand its influence between 1890 &amp; 1914???, 2 paragraph response
    6·1 answer
  • One of the Coercive Acts forced the colonies to allow British soldiers to live among the colonists. True False
    15·2 answers
  • Question 1 Leonid Brezhnev options: a. valued stability above all, blocking significant attempts to deal with economic/social pr
    9·1 answer
  • Who won the 1912 election
    15·2 answers
  • Y=x^2+2 let me know
    8·1 answer
  • By what mean did European kingdoms develop during the late Middle Ages?
    11·2 answers
  • Match each type of country with one of its central features
    10·2 answers
  • How many Russian soldiers died during the 1st two years of ww1?
    10·1 answer
  • NO LINKS OR ELSE YOU'LL BE REPORTED! Only answer if you're very good at History.
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!