The answer to this quesiton is <span> oversimplify the contents.
Every social occurences that happen could always be analyzed through different point of view, which will make us understand why and how the occurence happens. When we only focus on the conclusion, we will ignore the point of view that presented by the opposite factors of your argument which make your research seem biased.
</span>
Answer:Self-fulfilling prophecy
Explanation:
Self-fulfilling prophecy, this is when we believe and expect something to happen which is originally a false expectation but which actual end up confirming itself. According to self fulfilling prophecy when we expect certain things from people or from an individual they will start behaving in a way that will fulfill our expectations.
For example Megan has been placed in an advanced track by her teachers as a result she knows they are expecting the best from her and she start to score high marks and even qualifies for college.
I believe the answer is: Ethnocentricity.
ethnocentricity refers to the act of seeing our own culture as inherently superior compared to another culture. This often make people seeing the norms or tradition that exist in other culture by using our own as a standard. The more their culture deviate from ours, the more inferior we think their culture to be.
Some of the major factors that led to the ties between England and its colonies were associated with British taxation policy as well as their direct rule over the politics of their colonial territories. Specifically in the 13 American Colonies dissent grew due to a belief that the colonists were being taxed unfairly and were not given their right to representation that they believed was associated with taxation. In other British Colonies harsh colonial practices as well as indigenous rising nationalism led to the fracturing of the relationship between Britain and its colonies in places like the American colonies, India, and Arab countries.
Answer: D) "Since horses were not introduced to the Americas until Columbus, the Aztecs and Incas did not use horses or advanced weapons, while the Afro-Eurasians had highly developed cavalries and weaponry."
The answer is not A because Afro-Eurasia was composed of giant empires and governments, not small ones. The answer is not B because slavery was acceptable in the Incan and Aztec empires <u>as well as</u> in the Afro-Eurasia. Finally, it can't be C because in Afro-Eurasian governments, <u>only a few</u> were centered on religious beliefs, not all.
