This is an example of kohlberg's individualism, instrumental purpose, and exchange stage of moral development.
These kids are in the <u>preconventional level</u>, where their sense of morality is externally controlled. They accept and believe the rules of authority figures, such as parents and teachers. A child with pre-conventional morality has not yet adopted or internalized society’s conventions regarding what is right or wrong, but instead focuses largely on external consequences that certain actions may bring. In this particular example they are in the <u>Stage 2: Instrumental Orientation</u>. The reasoning shows a limited interest in the needs of others, only to the point where it might further the individual’s own interests. As a result, concern for others is not based on loyalty or intrinsic respect, but rather a “you scratch my back, and I’ll scratch yours” mentality.
Government regulation is planned to B. discourage producers from taking harmful actions.
<h3>What is the main objective of government regulation?</h3>
The objective of much federal regulation is to provide protection, either to someone's or to the environment. Whether the topic is environmental preservation, safety and health in the home or workplace, or consumption of goods and services, restrictions can have far reaching effects.
<h3>What are the results of government regulation?</h3>
Such regulations can limit corruption, increase worker safety, discourage unfair business methods, and contribute in many other ways to a safer, healthier, more productive, and more equitable community.
To learn more about Government regulation, refer
brainly.com/question/13758423
#SPJ4
Answer:
2 years 11 months and 8 days
A physician recruiting his patients
<span>In deferential vulnerability the authority over the prospective subject is due to informal power relationships rather than formal hierarchies. The power relationship may be based on gender, race, or class inequalities, or they can be inequalities in knowledge (such as in the doctor-patient relationship). Like institutional vulnerability, deferential vulnerability increases the risk of harm that informed consent would be compromised because it is not fully voluntary.</span>
Answer:
If John stops leaving his room in a mess in the future, then losing his wallet has functioned as a negative punishment.
Explanation:
- Punishment is taking something that someone likes from them in order to reduce instances of occurrence of a certain unwanted behavior.
- Negative punishment is therefore the occurrence of a disliked consequence as a result of an unwanted action.
- In the above instance, John losing his wallet is negative, but it achieves a consequent desired behavior of self organization.
