Your answer is A, bank of america.
The rise of towns tended to weaken both feudalism and manorialism. ... Towns weakened manorialism by supplying serfs and peasants with a way to escape their lot in life. Many went to towns to work as wage laborers, thus depriving manors of crucial labor and creating a more fluid workforce in Europe.
The answer to this question is <span>Griswold v. Connecticut
The case revolved around </span><span>The case involved a </span>Connecticut<span> "</span>Comstock law<span>" which basically ban any form of substance that could intervene with pregnancy.
The court later rule that whether to use or not use birth control is the right of the people who did the intimate act and all people shall obtain their right to privacy.</span>
The myth that this statement dispels is that:
“Communication is inherently good.”
We have been communicating since we were born in this world.
However not all people are good communicators which makes this myth
dispellable. Just like money, communication can be used to deceive or
intimidate people.
Answer:
Using the cost-benefit analysis table to answer the question: should Mis. Baxter allow her students to take an open-book test the best option to fill the blank pace is: Mrs. Baxter may have to reteach the material.
Explanation:
First of all, let's analyze the context and the answers.
In this case, let's consider the first option. It doesn't matter if the students obtain better results if she instead applied a closed-book test. Increasing the notes the students would obtain wouldn't mean they learned the correct answer. But that they know how to find information. So it is the most logical considering the cost-benefit analysis.
The second option says that Mrs. Baxter wouldn't need to proctor the exam. But just because it is an open book test doesn't mean students won't feel insecure about their answers and won't copy from classmates, so it's wrong.
Parents may be happier with grades. This could be a good choice but may is such an ambiguous answer that doesn't say anything. It is a tricky answer we have a 50% chance they would be happier with nice grades, but if asked her the reason they wouldn't be happy. So, it's wrong because, in the end, she didn't test their knowledge.
Fourth option Parents will encourage children to study. They could provide them reinforcement for good performance but not encourage them. They would encourage them if they performed badly. Also if they knew how they obtained it, they would definitely know they were not tested and would have a reason to be rewarded. So it is also wrong.
