1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AURORKA [14]
3 years ago
13

When total production is greater than total expenditures, __________ is produced than households want to buy, which leads to ___

_______ in inventory, which signals firms that they have __________, which causes firms to cut back production.
Business
2 answers:
ycow [4]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The correct order of answer is: more, increases, overproduced

Explanation:

A situation in which the production level is higher than the population's consumption level is contemplated to be an overstock. An overstock happens when you have products that have not been sold due to the fact that the amount is higher than the project demanded.

This can only reduce when organisations agree to offer the same quantity which is needed in the market.

Vlad [161]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The correct answer is a) more, increase, overproduced.

Explanation:

Any production higher than the population's consumption level should be considered as excess inventory, which can only decrease when companies decide to reduce and offer the same quantity required by the market. In cases where consumer products that have a low maturity level are produced, these products may be lost, as well as technology goods that tend to depreciate as improvements are made to new products.

You might be interested in
The given data represent the total compensation for 10 randomly selected CEOs and their​ company's stock performance in 2009. An
jok3333 [9.3K]

Missing Question Data:

As the Question is missing relevant data, I have searched for it online and found a question similar. The data is attached in a picture file. It might be a little different from your actual question but same approach can be used to solve the question.

Answer with Explanation:

For simplicity, we denote the compensations with variable <em>x </em>and the stock return with variable <em>y.</em> Let us first find the mean and standard deviation for both compensation (x) and return (y).

Mean of Compensation (<em>x) </em> will be,

X\;=\;\frac{26.43\;+\;12.03\;+\;19.74\;+\;13.54\;+\;11.97\;+\;11.41\;+\;25.94\;+\;14.46\;+\;17.13\;+\;14.71}{10}

X\; = \;16.737

Mean of Stock Return (y) will be,

Y\;=\;\frac{5.43\;+\;30.89\;+\;31.89\;+\;80.06\;-\;8.22\;+\;2.89\;+\;4.39\;+\;10.95\;+\;4.18\;+\;11.94}{10}

Y\;=\;17.44

Standard Deviation for Compensation (x) is given by,

\sigma _{x}\;=\;\sqrt{\frac{\sum (x_{i}-X)^{2}}{N}}

\sigma _{x}\;=\;\sqrt{\frac{(26.43-16.73)^{2}+(12.03-16.73)^{2}+....+(14.71-16.73)^{2}}{10}}

\sigma _{x}\;=\;5.30

Standard Deviation for Compensation (x) is given by,

\sigma _{y}\;=\;\sqrt{\frac{\sum (y_{i}-Y)^{2}}{N}}

\sigma _{y}\;=\;\sqrt{\frac{(5.43-17.44)^{2}+(30.89-17.44)^{2}+....+(11.94-17.44)^{2}}{10}}

\sigma_{y}\;=\;23.97

To find the predicted stock return, we have to use the equation for of line of regression,

y_{required}\;-\;Y\;=\;z\;*\;\frac{\sigma _{x}}{\sigma _{y}}\;*\;(x_{required}-X)\;.........\;(1)

where,

z\; =\;Correlation\;coefficient\;=\;-0.2426\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;(given)

x_{required}\;=\;Compensation\;of\;\$15\;million\;=\;15

y_{required}\;=\;Stock\;return\;at\;x_{required}

Equation (1) will become,

y_{required}\;-\;17.44\;=\;-0.2426\;*\;\frac{5.30}{23.97}\;*\;(15\;-\;16.73)

y_{required}\;=\;-0.054*\;(-1.73)\;+\;17.44\;

y_{required}\;=\;17.533.

4 0
3 years ago
What is legislative ​
kari74 [83]

Answer:

having the power to make laws

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The day-to-day living conditions of modern Americans are very different from what they were in the 20th century. While doing res
wariber [46]

Answer:

To the first question: C)  C. There has been economic growth in our society.

To the second question: E). Economics.

Explanation:

To the first question:

A is false because there has been several recessions in the past 100 years

B is false because markets have failures, causing the recessions mentioned above.

D is false because there are still poor countries, and the concept of "invisible hand" isn't properly explained

To the second question:

The field of economics is the most accurate description of what the researchers are focusing.

En option A they talk about the monetary variable and status of the GDP (recession is associated as decreasing in GDP)

Option B talks about the markets.

C outright spells "economic"

D "the invisible hand" is a concept invented by Adam Smith, the father of modern economics

6 0
4 years ago
Last year Kruse Corp had $355,000 of assets, $403,000 of sales, $28,250 of net income, and a debt-to-total-assets ratio of 39%.
maksim [4K]

Answer:

It will improve the ROE by 5.29%  to 18.34% from 13.05%

Explanation:

<u>current values</u>

assets 355,000

sales  403,000

net income 28,250

debt to assets = 39%

debt = assets x 39% =  355,00 x .39 = 138,450

equity = assets - debt = 355,000 - 138,450 = 216,550

<u>Current ROE</u>

net income / own funds (equity)

28,250/216,500 = 0,1304849 = 13.05%

<u>With the proposition of reducing assets to 252,500</u>

debt = assets x 39% =  252,500 x .39 = 98,475

equity = assets - debt = 252,500 - 98,475 = 154,025‬

<u>proposition expected ROE</u>

28,250/154,025 = 0,183411783 = 18.34%

<em>Change in ROE 18.34 - 13.05 = 5.29</em>

6 0
3 years ago
In one hour. Sue can produce 70 caps or 21 jackets and Tessa can produce 50 caps or 25 jackets. Sue's opportunity cost of produc
Marina CMI [18]

Answer:

both Sue and Tessa gain 0.3; 0.50

Explanation:

Sue's production possibilities frontier:

  • 70 caps
  • 21 jackets

Sue's opportunity cost:

  • opportunity cost of producing caps = 21 / 70 = 0.3 jackets
  • opportunity cost of producing jackets = 70/21 = 3.33 caps

Tessa's production possibilities frontier:

  • 50 caps
  • 25 jackets

Tessa's opportunity cost:

  • opportunity cost of producing caps = 25 / 50 = 0.5 jackets
  • opportunity cost of producing jackets = 50/25 = 2 caps

Sue should produce caps and Tessa jackets:

total production = 70 caps (Sue) + 25 jackets (Tessa), if they trade they will both win because each specialized in producing the good in which they have a comparative advantage (lower opportunity costs). If Sue traded and received 21 jackets, she would still have 28 caps left. If Tessa traded and received 50 caps, she would still have 10 jackets left.

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Agriculture commodities are usually sold under which environment
    12·1 answer
  • Protect the fundamental rights and liberties of citizens.
    15·1 answer
  • The dmv may impose certain restrictions on a driver license and, therefore, the driver; this is done to ensure the safe operatio
    15·1 answer
  • Name one way establishing credit
    10·1 answer
  • The number of candidates at the screening interview round of a company's recruitment process was 72. By the time of the selectio
    14·1 answer
  • You are a birder (birdwatcher) and your neighbor has put up several birdhouses in her yard and also planted trees and flowers th
    5·1 answer
  • Waterway Industries can produce and sell only one of the following two products: Oven Contribution Hours Required Margin Per Uni
    9·1 answer
  • How much would it cost to ship a package weighing 3. 2 pounds? Explain how you arrived at your answer. (3 points).
    6·1 answer
  • 100 percent of your income after you re tire will probably come from social security
    15·1 answer
  • Any changes to a firm's projected future cash flows that are caused by adding a new project are referred to as:________
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!