Answer:
The interest payable is calculated based on the principal, interest rate, number of years of the loan or of the deposit.
Explanation:
Financial institutions is a company or a firm that deals with financial and monetary activities such as; loans, deposits, investments and currency exchange. Most financial transactions especially loans and savings usually have an interest rate that is set by the financial institution. The amount of interest can be paid by the borrower in a case where an individual takes a loan from the financial institution. Interest can also be paid by the financial institution in a case where the individual or group opens a savings account with the financial institution. In both cases, the interest rate is set by the financial institution. The amount of interest payable can be determined using the formula below;
A=PRT
where;
A=amount of interest payable
P=principle amount. The principal amount can either be the loan amount or the savings deposit amount
R=interest rate
T=number of years
The interest payable is calculated based on the principal, interest rate, number of years of the loan or of the deposit.
Answer:
The answer is NO.
Explanation:
The answer is NO since the tax cut does not equate or rather would not be an effective stimulus due to the fact that debt reduction would not stimulate or increase consumption.
To properly understand the narrative of the question and the answer herein, let us define what effective stimulus is.
Effective stimulus or as preferably known as An economic stimulus is the utilization of funds or design of that helps agitate growth during downtime or recession in a country. The decision makers of a country mostly utilize the tactics of giving rebates and increasing government expenses to name a few.
Now relating it back to the question, since the intention of the rebate is to ease payment on tax does not equate to increase in consumption, the answer is a NO.
I think it’s false because no one was buying anything during the depression
Answer: Winona has the lowest opportunity cost of completing the task.
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the opportunity cost will be calculated as:
= Earnings per hour × Hours taken to complete the task
Therefore, for Winona, the opportunity cost will be:
= 1 × $200.
= $200.
For Hubert, the opportunity cost will be:
= 9 × $25
= $225
Therefore, based on the calculation above, Winona has the lowest opportunity cost of completing the task.
Answer:
c) is the same along both curves.
Explanation:
Two straight-line PPFs have the same vertical intercept, but curve I is flatter than curve II. The opportunity cost of producing the good on the horizontal axis is the same along both curves.
