Answer: Filtering
Explanation:
Filtering in communication occurs when information passed on between two bodies is being reduced by the middlemen, where the middlemen are not able to communicate favourable with either party and it affects either of the party, it's called filtering. The inability for the salesperson's to communicate the technical knowledge of the product to the customers which they are being taught during trainings is known as filtering in communication. This causes the business loss as the customers are not able to operate the equipment effectively which the business sells.
Teenage entrepreneurship is growing especially in the health industry and saving the environment.
Answer:
Fabiola pays 27.0963 dollars for 8.79877 gallons of fuel.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that,
Fabiola pays 357 pesos for 40 liters of fuel.
It is required to convert the amount in dollars.
Since, we know that,
1 peso = 0.0759 dollars
So, 357 pesos = 0.0759 × 357 = 27.0963 dollars
Moreover,
1 liter = 0.219969 gallons
So, 40 liters = 0.219969 × 40 = 8.79877 gallons
Thus, we get that,
Fabiola pays 27.0963 dollars for 8.79877 gallons of fuel.
Answer:
The correct answer is option a.
Explanation:
Apples and oranges are substitutes. An increase in the price of oranges will cause the demand for apples to increase. This is because people will prefer a cheaper substitute. This increase in the demand for apples will cause its demand curve to shift to the right.
The rightward shift in the demand curve will cause the equilibrium price to increase. But this change in price will not cause a change in demand. The change in price affects only the quantity demanded. Change in demand happens because of a change in other factors.
So, the given statement is not correct.
Answer:
Type 1 decision error cost and Type 2 decision error cost
Explanation:
Type 1 decision error cost has to do with recruiting the wrong candidate or person specification for the job, type 1 error are expensive to the organization and frustrating to the employees. Type 2 decision error cost has to do with the opportunity cost forgone, when the right candidate which could have been hired, was not hired.
The CEO is likely to discover the Type 1 decision error cost
