Answer:
$ 1733
Explanation:
Cost Marginal Investment in Accounts Receivable = Marginal Investment in Accounts Receivable * firm's required return on investment
Marginal Investment in Accounts Receivable = Average Investments Under proposed Plan - Average Investments Under present Plans
Average Investments in Accounts Receivable = Total variable cost of annual sales / Turn over of account receivables
Turn Over of account receivables = 360/ average collection period.
Using above formula for calculation , Answer = $ 8665 * 20% = $ 1733
Answer:
wholly owned subsidiary
Explanation:
A wholly-owned subsidiary is a form of subsidiary arrangement, between two companies, whereby a company is completely owned or its whole stock is bought by another company often referred to as Parent Company after the arrangement or the agreement of the acquisition.
It is also characterized by having control over its resources and specific mission, also operates independently.
Hence, in this case, the right answer is a wholly owned subsidiary
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
The yYearly Equal Cash Inflows =
= 46000
Present Value of Inflows at the rate of 10% = 
= 46000 multiply with 3.791 = 174386
NPV = 174386 minus 132500 = 42386
<u>
Briggs must make an investment in the project as it generates additional wealth and NPV is positive
</u>
For NPV = 0, PV of inflows = 132500
PV Of Inflows = Annual Cash Flow multiply with 3.791
Annual Cash Flow = 132500 divide by 3.791 = 34951.20
So, Hours =
= 1193.08 hours
Answer:
Option (c) is correct.
Explanation:
We know that beef is used as an ingredient or input in making hamburgers. If the price of the input i.e beef increases then as a result supply of hamburgers decreases because of the higher cost of production. This will shift the supply curve leftwards, its shows that lesser supply with same level of demand will lead to higher prices of hamburgers.
Answer:
The correct answer is D
Explanation:
Horns error is the term which defined as the error, where the opinion of one is color with the opinion of the others. This kind of error involves or comprise the negative ratings. This will be called as the horns error.
In this case, an employee computed the manager low on all the performance due to the dissatisfaction with the disposition of the manager. So, the employee committed to a horns error.
