1. <span>resumed fighting.
2. </span><span>broke his promise not to raise new taxes.
3. </span><span>The United States failed to get involved in Rwanda when Tutsi people were being killed.
4. </span><span>Bush’s popularity soared.
5. </span><span>The federal budget was balanced.
6. </span><span>compromise with Congress.
7. </span><span>The world depended on Kuwait for oil.
8. </span><span>to share the responsibility for government debt reduction.
Hopefully this helped you!</span>
Answer:
They believed that British actions were harming their economy and threatening expansion into western lands. (impressment, forts on US land supporting Native Americans)
Explanation:
Answer: It has stayed the same and it would be the same because politics just promised but never comply!
Explanation:
Public policy in the United States is shaped by a wide variety of forces, from polls and election results to interest groups and institutions, both formal and informal. In addition to political parties, the influence of diverse and sometimes antagonistic political forces has been widely acknowledged by policymakers and evidenced by scholars, and journalists. In recent years concerns have been growing that deep-pocketed donors now play an unprecedented role in American politics — concerns supported by 2013 research from Harvard and the University of Sydney that found that for election integrity, the U.S. ranked 26th out of 66 countries analyzed.
The question of who shapes public policies and under what conditions is a critical one, particularly in the context of declining voter turnout. From both a theoretical and practical point of view, it is important to understand if voters still have the possibility of providing meaningful input into public policies, or if the government bypasses citizens in favor of economic elites and interest groups with strong fundraising and organizational capacity.
Answer:
It could not make steady profits and faced bankruptcy.
Explanation:
B
