The clause is really a state's rights clause. A state may not pass a law that makes something illegal that was legal before the law was passed. In other words if a state suddenly passed a law that said it is no longer legal to park your car in front of any government building, but it was legal to do so yesterday, the police cannot come to your door and issue a ticket for parking in front of a government building because you did it yesterday.
The constitution actually uses the phrase ex post facto law in Article 1 Section 10 Clause 1.
El Humanismo renacentista es un movimiento intelectual, filosófico y cultural europeo estrechamente ligado al Renacimiento cuyo origen se sitúa en la Italia del siglo XV (especialmente en Florencia, Roma y Venecia), con precursores anteriores, como Dante Alighieri, Francesco Petrarca y Giovanni Boccaccio.
The statement "James Jay created an invisible ink system that required two chemicals" includes the explicit information from the excerpt.
<h3>Statement including explicit:</h3>
Nothing is implied when explicit information is stated. The phrase "it was a dark and stormy night," for example, contains explicit information that leaves no room for interpretation. By any stretch of the imagination, the reader cannot assume that the story takes place on a sunny morning.
Therefore, the correct option is the last sentence.
Learn more about explicit information:
brainly.com/question/8372599
