All categories

2 years ago

Which of the following is NOT one of the three big categories for periodic evaluations:

Business

1 answer:

Lilit [14]2 years ago

4 0

The category that does not belong to the periodic evaluation is Change Analysis.

Option D is the correct answer.

<h3>What is a periodic evaluation?</h3>

Periodic evaluation is a technique that is totally developmental in nature and disregards the formal advice relating to tenure, retention, or promotion of employees.

Periodic evaluation has three broad categories namely, hazard analysis, safety, and health-related inspections, and evaluation relating to personal protective equipment (PPE).

Therefore, out of the provided options, Change analysis is not considered a category for periodic evaluation.

Learn more about the periodic evaluation. in the related link;

brainly.com/question/17095233

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

All of the following are reasons for a company to repurchase its previously issued stock, except:

gladu [14]

Answer:

The correct answer is option d. to increase the shares outstanding.

Explanation:

A company can repurchase its previously purchased stocks to resell to the employees, for bonuses to employees and to even support the market price of the stock.

But the company certainly will not repurchase its previously purchased stocks to increase the shares outstanding.

I hope the answer is helpful.

Thanks for asking.

4 0

3 years ago

Workers with knowledge-based education and managerial skills are

Lady_Fox [76]

C Skilled labour as it say in the statement

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Identify the internal control weakness in the following situations. State how the person can hurt the company.

Degger [83]

Answer:

Identification of the Internal Control Weaknesses:

A. There is no segregation of duties and there is lack of access control. Jerry Miller as a security guard is not expected to have a master key to the cash box. With this he can pilfer the cash. If he prepares the report that shows the number of cars that parked on the lot, he is not supposed to also prepare the day's cash receipts. Otherwise, he can state any number of cars as parked that he likes, and which corresponds to the cash he might leave in the Cash box since he also has a master key.

B. There is no segregation of duties and there is lack of supervision, proper reconciliations, and assets audit. Sharon Fisher handles purchase transactions from the beginning to the close all alone with a third party. This exposes the company to procurement frauds and collusion with suppliers. She can purchase assets for the company at prices that would enrich her personally.

C. Forming an audit opinion on the basis of ratio analysis of last year's comparative financial statements exposes the company to audit risks. While ratio analysis is part of the basis for forming audit opinions, it is surely not the first audit procedure to obtain audit evidence to support his audit opinion on the financial statements. An auditor is expected to obtain sufficient audit evidence and perform audit substantive tests of financial statement assertions. He or she is also expected to review the internal control system to ensure that it is operating effectively after establishing its existence and reviewing changes in internal controls.

Explanation:

Internal Controls are controls established by management in order to help it achieve business goals. There are many internal controls, including Separation of Duties, Access Controls , Authorization and Approvals, Asset Audits, Reconciliations, and Data Backups. The purposes of internal controls are to establish the reliability of financial reporting, ensure timely feedback on the achievement of operational or strategic goals, and achieve compliance with financial management laws, and accounting regulations.

4 0

4 years ago

Max owns a townhouse in Sacramento. He is in the process of leasing it to Hannah. The contractual lease states Hannah Scott will

Digiron [165]

The minimum requirement for a California lease that is missing in the contractual lease between Max and Hannah Scott is the<u> absence of a sufficient description of the property</u>.

<h3>What are the minimum requirements for a California lease?</h3>

A California lease requires a <u>sufficient description of the property</u>, for example, an address, which gives it a legal description.

Other requirements for a California lease include:

Rental amount
Duration of the rental period
Payment due dates
Deposits or fees
Condition of the property at the beginning of the lease
Maintenance expectations.

<h3>Question Completion with Answer Options:</h3>

a. No, the lease has met all of the minimum lease requirements of the state of California.

b. Yes, the missing minimum requirement is the absence of the issue of a security deposit.

c. Yes, the missing minimum requirement is the absence of any assignment and subleasing options.

d. Yes, the missing minimum requirement is the absence of a sufficient description of the property, such as an address and/or a legal description.

Thus, the minimum requirement for a California lease that is missing in the contractual lease between Max and Hannah Scott is the<u> absence of a sufficient description of the property</u>.

Learn more about California lease requirements at brainly.com/question/14299105

#SPJ12

7 0

2 years ago

When Padgett Properties LLC was formed, Nova contributed land (value of $358,500 and basis of $89,625) and $179,250 cash, and Os

lawyer [7]

Answer:Amount of Nova and Oscar's gain=$492,937.50

Explanation:

a)According to Land recorded for § 704(b) book capital account purposes, Land is recorded at fair market value. With this, the Padgett properties should record the land at $358,500

b)From the question, it is given that the basis of land is $89,625. Therefore, the Padgett Properties LLC's tax basis in the land is $89,625.

c)Amount of Nova and Oscar's gain.

Fair market value of Land $358,500

Basis of land $89,625

total $ 448,125

but Gain = Selling price of land - Fair value of Land x interest in partnership profits and capital

= $537,750 - ($358,500+$89,625 )

=($537,750 - $448,125 ) x 50% =$44,812.50

Total gain $448,125 + $44,812.50 =$492,937.50

4 0

3 years ago