Answer: False.
Explanation:
The nature versus nurture debate is strong within psychology.
Nature regards genetic and hereditary determinants that shape people´s physical traits and personality. On the other hand, nurture applies to environmental elements that influence people´s development, such as early childhood events, the way they are raised, their relationships, and their environment.
In this example, Sam´s progress in maths can only be explained by his teacher helping him, meaning that nature had nothing to do with it, but was nurture what allowed that outcome.
The suggestions are:
Be VERY understanding of their feelings
Do not do it out of apology but out of love-- don't apologize for God's ways
That day, make them feel as much involved and invited as you can.
These are very important suggestions to treat people in this situation because is important to know that they are important even if their opinions are not the same as yours.
Answer:
nice! great job, hope you do good always :)
Explanation:
plz mark brainliest! ty <3
Answer: The amendment had been rejected by most Southern states but was ratified by the required three-fourths of the states. Known as the "Reconstruction Amendment," it forbids any state to deny any person "life, liberty or property, without due process of law" or to "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Explanation:
Answer:
65
Explanation:
An autosomal dominant condition is one where one copy of the allele is sufficient to cause the condition. Penetrance refers to the degree to which that mutation causes the phenotype
Lets say the allele for sharp beak is S and for normal beak is s. If 2 heterozygous sharp-beaked terrapins mate, the cross is the following:
Ss x Ss
<u> S s </u>
S SS Ss
s Ss ss
The possible genotypes are SS, Ss and ss. 50% of their offspring will be heterozygous, and 25% homozygous each. Therefore, if the mutation was fully penetrant, it would be 75 out of 100 offspring would be affected.
However, the mutation is only 87% penetrant, which means only 87% of those 75 offspring would have the condition.
87% of 75 = 65.25
Therefore, we would expect 65 of their offspring to have sharp beaks
