All categories

3 years ago

How did the progressive philosophies of roosevelt and wilson differ

2 answers:

7 0

They see education as the key to bridging the gap between their wasteful societies today and technologically enlightened future societies. Scientific management, as officially announced by Frederick Winslow Taylor, became the watchword for industrial efficiency and waste removal, with a stopwatch as its symbol.

<h2 /><h2>Further explanation</h2>

The Progressive Era was a period of extensive social activism and political reform throughout the United States that stretched in the 1890s to 1920s. The main objective of the Progressive movement is to overcome the problems caused by industrialization, urbanization, immigration and political corruption. This movement mainly targets political machines and their bosses. By removing this corrupt representative in office, further means of direct democracy will be established. They also sought monopoly and corporate regulations through antitrust laws, which were seen as a way to promote equal competition for the benefit of legitimate competitors. They also advocate for new roles and government regulations, and new agents to carry out these roles, such as the FDA.

Many activists joined efforts to reform local government, public education, medicine, finance, insurance, industry, railroad, church, and many other fields. Progressive change, professionalize and make "scientific" social science, especially history, economics, and political science. In the academic field, amateur writer day gave way to research professors that were published in new journals and scientific journals. The leaders of the movement also exist far from presidential politics: Jane Addams, Grace Abbott, Edith Abbott and Sophonisba Breckinridge are among the most influential non-governmental Progressive Era reformers.

Learn More

The Progressive Era : brainly.com/question/11556209

Details

Class: high school

Subject: history

Keywords : activists, Progressives

IPS

solong [7]3 years ago

6 0

Wilson had a direct approach to problems while Roosevelt had an indirect approach, both of them had the same agenda regarding cartels but they had different ways of solving the problem.

Roosevelt defended natural resources putting them on federal protection and, safeguarded laborers rights.

Wilson focused mainly on the Triple Wall of Privilege, it meant that he would attack tariffs, banks, and trusts. Different from Roosevelt, Wilson didn’t distinguish good trusts from bad trusts, he was against any trust.

You might be interested in

4.How can GDP per capita and poverty rates indicate standards of living in each system?

ZanzabumX [31]

<span>When GDP per capita is lower, the poverty rate will tend to be higher. People, on average, will be producing less in that economy as well as being paid less for what they do produce. This will lead to a lowered standard of living. Economies with lower poverty rates will have higher per capita GDP and better standards.</span>

6 0

3 years ago

What did Britain's navy do to American ports and harbors

Marina86 [1]

Answer:

green bean

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

One power given to the states under the Constitution is the ability to

STatiana [176]

A
regulate interstate commerce

5 0

3 years ago

What was the purpose of the Grandfather Clause?

Dvinal [7]

<span>Allow people that couldn't pay taxes or read to vote if his father or grandfather could vote.
</span>

6 0

3 years ago

One striking difference between the British and the French imperial models in Africa is that the British established schools and

Studentka2010 [4]

Answer:

the British preferred to use local institutions to control subject populations.

Explanation:

British colonialism was established differently in places that had already established their own institutions, such as African countries. Although these countries already had institutions before the arrival of the English, it was necessary that the British empire dominate these institutions, or to give them up and form new institutions. However, the British empire understood that dominating existing institutions would be something cheaper and more advantageous and that it would establish an efficient dominance, so it was done, that is, unlike other European nations, England decided to use local institutions to control populations subdued.

3 0

3 years ago