Answer:
The correct answer is the option C: give too much weight to a small number of vivid observations.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the case that a close friend had told you that he had a bad experience in a certain place, a restaurant in particular this time, does not states the fact that it will always be like that for every person that goes to that place because it may have been a bad day for the employees and that impacts at their work while if you go any other day every detail is taking care nicely. Therefore that the people give too much weight to small number of vivid observations due to the fact that the article published in the newspaper must have been made with over dozens of observations and comments, not just one, and the major agreement is that those places are good ones to go to eat.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Suspects who are being questioned by police.
Explanation:
Suspects of a crime are people who the police believe guilty of an offense based on information they have gathered that may prove that people are at fault, yet, guilt has not been proven. During a questionnaire, suspects are not the responsibility of the government. Then, in front of any medical issue caused during the interview, the suspect will have to handle the coverage of the assistance expense with <em>his or her insurance</em>.
The answer is The income effect.
Income effect is described as the change in demand of a service or good brought on by change in the income of a consumer.It is observed in two cases first is when income of person increases and second is when price of goods or service decreases.
The scenario given in the question is an example of second case as the price of burger was less than normal Steve perceived his income to be able to buy more product in same price
Dhjsjdndjjdjdjsjsjdjdjfjfjfjfjdjdjd I don’t know sorry <3