1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mama L [17]
3 years ago
10

American revolution local context: broad context: other context:

History
2 answers:
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]3 years ago
5 0

The American Revolution didn’t just take place in an internal context of colonial North America and the British Empire, but really in a transnational context

Internal context:. From about 1650 to 1763, Britain essentially allowed American colonies to run themselves with certain freedom, giving them the privilege to do as they wished. North American settlers developed unique forms of government by establishing representative legislatures and democratic town meetings. They had local juries and trials in which defendants were assumed innocent until proven guilty. American shipping, while technically regulated by the Navigation Act, functioned apart from the British fleet. That freedom gave settlers the idea that they were direct subjects of the British crown, and that they had their own little parliaments, just like England and Scotland and Wales had the Parliament in London. They saw American Colonies as having the same status as the crown with the same privileges and rights.

This freedom finished with Britain imposing unpopular taxes on America and tightened shipping and currency regulations. Colonial settlers could not have their own currency and were ordered to house British troops, they were made to follow restrictive shipping policies, and many of those who failed to comply with the new rules faced a British judge without jury. Americans were appalled and stunned by what they regarded as violations of their rights. In addition, after having fought the war against France for American territory, the British Empire set up a permanent army paid for by colonists’ taxes to prevent them from expanding which infuriated American settlers and contributed to the Revolution. With time, it all turned into indignation, and finally rebellion. In twelve years the colonists changed from offering nightly toasts to King George III to displays of opposition toward the British Crown.  

Broad Context:  

The British Empire was considered the most tolerant and liberal in those times, however agrarian economies had started to turn into commercial and International trade trends changed making it possible for Britain to impose taxes on goods shipped to and from its colonies. In fact London considered this as a necessary move to ease the pressure on their budget caused by seven years war of 1756-1763.  

Spanish and Dutch colonies became belligerent against Britain during those years and this clash of European empires generated a “war beyond America” reaching the West Indies, Africa and India.  

Other context

In 1761 political activism by Jesuits upset the monarchy in Spain who confiscated Jesuit properties in its American colonies and expelled the Jesuits boosting rioting in American colonies. In 1768 sugar consumption, which began among the Arabs grows in popularity,  and common Europeans became more familiar with sweet taste making demand for sugar elevate its price. In 1769 Spain has asked the Franciscan Order to replace Jesuits in Lower California and are sent to Upper California, to Christianize natives and to block Russian claims to coastal areas.

The American Revolution had consequences, not only for the American settlers but for the rest of the world as well. The Thomas Jefferson–Declaration of Independence was unique presenting a strong case for American rebellion and posting a model for other people's struggling for their own natural rights.


vagabundo [1.1K]3 years ago
4 0

They saw American Colonies as having an identical situation as the crown with the equivalent privileges and rights. The American Revolution didn’t just take place in the intimate happenings of isolated North America and the British Empire, but particularly in transnational events. The American Revolution didn’t just take segment in an internal connection of established North America and the British Empire, but certainly in a transnational context

Further Explanations :

Broad context: From about 1650 to 1763, Britain acknowledged American communities to run themselves with a genuine democracy, furnishing them the opportunity to do as they wanted. North American immigrants revealed different kinds of management by building democratic authorities and representative town gatherings.

Local context: Of concerning  from1650 to 1763, Britain acknowledged American communities to run themselves with a guaranteed autonomy, furnishing them the opportunity to do as they wanted. North American immigrants advanced unique arrangements of authority by instituting characteristic governments and representative town meetings.

Other Context: This independence varnished with Britain inflicting despised obligations on America and toughened transportation and money ordinances. Colonial immigrants could not have their money and were commanded to house British companies, they were arranged to succeed prohibitive shipping arrangements and many of those who deserted to comply with the new jurisdictions confronted by a British judge outwardly a jury.

Learn more:

1. Why were taxes an ongoing source of conflict for the American colonists? brainly.com/question/2136001

2. Which would most likely fall under the original jurisdiction of the supreme court? brainly.com/question/2816742

3. Though the outcomes of Scheck and new York times differed, what did these decisions have in common? the government has a heavy burden to prove harm. the government can limit speech that causes harm. the government has unlimited power to limit speech. the government must follow the first amendment? brainly.com/question/637963

Answer details:

Grade: High school

Subject: History

Topic: American revolution

Keywords : American, colonies, freedom, currency, context, privilege, American, revolution, jury, settlers, legislatures, meetings, representative.

You might be interested in
Summarize the mcdonald vs chicago case
Gala2k [10]

McDonald v. City of Chicago, case in which on June 28, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5–4) that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,” applies to state and local governments as well as to the federal government.

The case arose in 2008, when Otis McDonald, a retired African American custodian, and others filed suit in U.S. District Court to challenge provisions of a 1982 Chicago law that, among other things, generally banned the new registration of handguns and made registration a prerequisite of possession of a firearm. The next day the National Rifle Association and others filed separate lawsuits challenging the Chicago law and an Oak Park, Ill., law that generally prohibited the possession or carrying of handguns and the carrying of other firearms except rifles or shotguns in one’s home or place of business. Each suit alleged that the law violated the right of individuals to possess and carry weapons, which the Supreme Court had found to be protected by the Second Amendment in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008). (Anticipating this finding, the plaintiffs in McDonald v. City of Chicago filed suit on the same morning that the decision in Heller was announced.) The crucial question, however, was whether the Second Amendment is applicable to the states and their political subdivisions. Citing “selective incorporation,” the Supreme Court’s gradual application to the states of most of the protections of the Bill of Rights through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (which prohibits the states from denying life, liberty, or property without due process of law), the plaintiffs argued that the Second Amendment is applicable through that clause as well as through the amendment’s “privileges or immunities” clause (which forbids the states from abridging the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States)

                <u><em>Have a good day, afternoon or night!</em></u>

<u><em></em></u>

<u><em></em></u>

<u><em></em></u>

<u><em></em></u>

<u><em></em></u>

<u><em></em></u>

<u><em></em></u>

<u><em></em></u>

<u><em></em></u>

<em>                                          ~Dreamer1331~</em>

3 0
2 years ago
Analyze the chart below and answer the question that follows.
VARVARA [1.3K]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Describe Hellenistic culture in the city of Alexandria.
zmey [24]
Alexandrian Greeks placed an emphasis on Hellenistic culture, in part to exclude and subjugate non-Greeks. The law in Alexandria was based on Greek—especially Attic—law. There were two institutions in Alexandria devoted to the preservation and study of Greek culture, which helped to exclude non-Greeks.
4 0
3 years ago
What did the British agree to do after the end of World War II?
Doss [256]

Answer:

c but i dont really know for sure

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What allowed specialization and division of labor to develop in Mesopotamia
vladimir2022 [97]

Answer:The fact that most allowed specialized and division of labor to develop in mesopotamia was "agriculture," since this meant that people could focus on developing other skills and tasks aside from finding and producing food. 

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/1087259#readmore

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Are the goals and objectives of the constitution such as the rule of law relevant today?
    7·1 answer
  • What underlying motive led Great Britain to declare war on Germany?
    10·1 answer
  • Of the following groups, which was the last to receive the right to vote
    15·1 answer
  • Wich states were border states?why were these states conflicted on who to support in the war??????
    7·2 answers
  • How might checks and balances relate to journalism?
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement describes how the fall of Rome affected culture and civilization in Western Europe? A. Without Roman soldiers to
    15·2 answers
  • What was the New Jersey plan and the Virginia plan?​
    5·2 answers
  • What type of government did James Monroe believes the United States should have?
    14·2 answers
  • After Texas seceded from the United States, it...
    11·1 answer
  • North and South just finished fighting a war that cost 750,000 Amer mention that millions of dollars of damage and destruction t
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!