According to historians from the 1960s how could FDR have more effectively dealt with the great depression?

History

2 answers:

Gala2k [10]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

E. by improving race relations and better wealth redistribution and trade regulations.

Explanation:

Historians from the 1960s believed that FDR could have improved in some of the ways in which he dealt with the Great Depression. They argued that FDR could have worked more on improving race relations and on implementing a better system of wealth redistribution and trade regulations. This is partly because these topics were very relevant to the political context of the 1960s.

mina [271]3 years ago

4 0

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "E. by improving race relations and better wealth redistribution and trade regulations." According to historians from the 1960s FDR have more effectively dealt with the great depression by improving race relations and better wealth redistribution and trade regulations

You might be interested in

Are the lands of Southeast Asia were perfect for plantation agriculture

Vlad1618 [11]

Yes they were perfect for agriculture

8 0

3 years ago

The two social classes of ancient Rome were made up of patricians and

astra-53 [7]

Plebeians and it is correct

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following leaders is widely considered the "Father of the Constitution"?

ElenaW [278]

Answer:

James Madison

James Madison is generally regarded as the father of the United States Constitution.

4 0

2 years ago

How much power do the states have in the confederate system of goverment

Vadim26 [7]

In a confederate system, the states have most of the power. The central government has very little. When the US had a confederate form of government, the central government could not tax the states or even raise a military, because they could not get people to enlist.

8 0

3 years ago

Sort each proposal by placing it beneath the states that supported it.

dangina [55]

Virginia Plan--3. Called for bicameral legislature; 5. Called for proportional representation; 6. Was supported by larger states

New Jersey Plan--1. Called for equal representation; 2. Was supported by smaller states; 4. Called for a unicameral legislature

The Virginia and New Jersey Plans were proposals of how to handle the issue of a federal legislature and how representation would be determined for the legislature. The Virginia Plan called for two houses: an upper and lower and representation based on population. This plan would best serve the states with larger populations because they would have more say in the government. However, this plan would shut out the voices of smaller states. The New Jersey Plan suggested a one house legislature with each state having equal representation. Essentially they wanted to keep the same system created under the Articles of Confederation. This would give all states a say but not all voices would be counted. Ultimately, the Connecticut Compromise or Great Compromise settled the issue by creating a bi-cameral or two house legislature with one house having equal representation and the other house having representation based on population.

3 0

3 years ago