Answer:
is it all of them
Step-by-step explanation:
The first false statement in the proof as it stands is in Line 5, where it is claimed that a line of length 2.83 is congruent to a line of length 4.47. This mistake cannot be corrected by adding lines to the proof.
_____
The first erroneous tactical move is in Line 4, where the length of DE is computed, rather than the length of FD. This mistake can be corrected by adding lines to the proof.
A correct SAS proof would use segment FD in Line 4, so it could be argued that the first mistake is there.
Answer:
To find the inverse you switch x and y
Step-by-step explanation:
3y-4x=6
So 3y = 4x+6
and Y = 4/3x + 2
Answer:
#16 = (0, -10)
#17 = (-18, -3)
Step-by-step explanation:
U wouldn't use the distance formula, you would need to use the Midpoint Formula, which is, M = (x1 + x2 / 2, y1 + y2 / 2). For #16, you plug in (4, -5) for M and 8 for x1 and 0 for y1, so the equation should look like this : (4, -5) = (8 + x2 / 2, 0 + y2 / 2). Then separate the equation to make it easier: 4 = 8 + x2 / 2 and the second equation : -5 = 0 + y2 / 2. So let's do the 1st equation, the first step would be to multiply the 2 to both sides. So the equation should look like this, 8 = 8 + x. Then subtract the 8 from both sides and you get 0 as your x. Now moving on to the 2nd equation, you multiply the 2 to both sides, and you get, -10 = 0 + y, as your equation, but since 0 won't affect it, -10 should be your y. Then just use these steps to solve #17, and your answer should be (-18, -3).
