1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mashcka [7]
3 years ago
5

the berlin conference of 1885 is said to have set off a scramble for africa that means that europeans

History
2 answers:
nataly862011 [7]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is A) rushed to set up colonies in Africa.

The other options of the question were B) fought each other on Africa soil before leaving the continent. C) abandoned plans for establishing colonies. D) grew interested in African music and art forms.

The Berlin Conference of 1885 is said to have set off a scramble for Africa that means that Europeans rushed to set up colonies in Africa.

Indeed the name of this action was called  "the Scramble for Africa." European superpowers occupied the African territories, split them, and colonized the regions in order to exploit the many natural resources and raw materials that existed in Africa. It started in 1881 and ended until 1914.

Vaselesa [24]3 years ago
3 0
Europeans split up the continent of Africa amongst themselves.  It "set off a scramble" because all of the countries that were represented in the Berlin Conference wanted to have the biggest amount of land they could.
You might be interested in
7. William Seward’s purchase of Alaska in 1867 was initially called “Sewards Folly” by his opponents, but the purchase proved to
olga_2 [115]

<u>Answer</u>:

William Seward’s purchase of Alaska in 1867 was initially called “Sewards Folly” by his opponents, but the purchase proved to be a bargain because (A) Alaska had many natural resources.

<u>Explanation</u>:

Alaska was found to be a region with many natural resources. These plenty of resources gave way to to the purchase of seward folly. Many great and generous transactions were made during this time. Dealings like to buy and sell goods at a cheaper price was also there.

A good social relationship was established betweem the buyers and sellers as well. The secretary or the chief officer of the United States  believed and realised that this is a false dealing. As folly means false. They were not satisfied wih this sewards folly at all.

3 0
3 years ago
analyze the pros and cons of establishing smaller ethnic communities within larger communities like Chinatown and Little Italy.
olasank [31]
I believe that the answer to the question provided above is that <span> establishing smaller ethnic communities within larger communities gives more chance for people to know each other more but this might lead to the </span>conflict between groups.

Hope my answer would be a great help for you.    If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
3 0
3 years ago
How should members of Congress vote?
Elenna [48]

Explanation:

members of Congress reflect the will of the people, or should they pay attention to their own points of ... How should he or she vote

6 0
2 years ago
Five most valuable artifacts in Europe
SIZIF [17.4K]

Answer:

at can be found around the world:

Greywacke Statue Tribute to Isis.

Harrington Commode.

Goddard-Townsend Antique Secretary Desk.

Pinner Qing Dynasty Vase.

Rosetta Stone.

Diamond Panther Bracelet.

Napoleon's Gold-Encrusted Sword.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Explain why the northern earls revolted against Elizabeth I in 1569
marissa [1.9K]

Answer: The northern earls wanted Catholicism restored in England, instead of the Protestant Church which existed instead.

Explanation: the Northern Earls had become enraged over a number of issues that it led to the Revolt of the Northern Earls in 1569 and this was one of the issues The northern earls wanted Catholicism restored in England, instead of the Protestant Church which existed instead.

With communication being so difficult during the reign of Elizabeth, it was very difficult to govern such as large country and ensure that everyone was doing what they were supposed to. As a result of this many people in the North of England were still Catholics. This counted against the Northern nobles who remained loyal to Catholicism, when Elizabeth became Queen. Elizabeth as a Protestant promoted Protestants to key government positions of power.

During 1569, the Northern Earls had become enraged over a number of issues that it led to the Revolt of the Northern Earls in 1569. The Earls, first and foremost disagreed with Elizabeth about religion. They wanted Catholicism restored in England, instead of the Protestant Church which existed instead. Secondly, as a result of their Catholicism they had lost a great deal of influence at Court and this had annoyed many. In addition to this, Elizabeth’s lifestyle choices provoked the Earls as she refused to marry or to name and heir, leaving the future of the Kingdom in doubt.

There was however a solution to all of their problems. They had Elizabeth’s cousin, Mary, Queen of Scots as a figurehead who could replace Elizabeth. By replacing Elizabeth as Queen, Mary would be able to restore Catholicism, return the Earls to a position of influence and marry another Catholic to ensure the safety of Catholicism in England.

The key figures in the plot were Thomas Percy, the Earl of Northumberland; Charles Neville, Earl of Westmorland and Thomas Howard, Duke of Norfolk. Both Neville and Percy had lost position at court, and Norfolk too felt displaced as a result of the younger Protestant nobles which Elizabeth doted on.

It can be argued that the Revolt of the Northern Earls was a religious dispute, as the Earls wanted the restoration of Catholicism in England. Elizabeth had appointed James Pilkington as Archbishop of Durham in 1561. Pilkington was a Protestant and his appointment was supposed to stamp out Catholicism in northern England. Pilkington was harsh in his methods, and instead of turning the masses to Protestantism, the opposite occurred with many turning away from Protestantism and embracing Catholicism more fully.

However, some have argued that the Revolt was in fact a political problem rather than a religious one. Many of the Earls had felt displaced at court and a result began to detest Elizabeth. For Percy, the appointment of Sir John Forster as the Earl in charge of protecting England’s borders with Scotland cut deep. Many Earls did not like the influence and power that many ‘newcomers’ had over Elizabeth. In addition to this, Elizabeth refused to have an heir to succeed her. The Earls wanted to replace Elizabeth with Mary, Queen of Scots which would have ensured that the succession was secure. Mary, would marry the Duke of Norfolk and create an heir resulting in stability for England.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The methods of handling businesses and industries that conduct business around the world is known as
    15·1 answer
  • How many African American slaves lived on the Negro Fort?
    8·2 answers
  • The Non-Aggression Pact was created so that __________ would not declare war on each other.
    10·2 answers
  • Who wrote the Declaration of the Rights of Woman and the Female Citizen?
    5·2 answers
  • This is my prompt please help! I’ll give you 20 points(:
    8·2 answers
  • In 1972 Magnavox released what...?
    7·1 answer
  • Explain why there were mass casualties and why no side was winning?
    13·1 answer
  • What were the effects of imperialism in the Congo?
    11·1 answer
  • Choose the correct answer.
    7·1 answer
  • What are 5 facts about Red Summer
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!