The expression that is not a variation of the Pythagorean identity is the third option.
<h3>
What is the Pythagorean identity?</h3>
The Pythagorean identity can be written as:
For example, if we subtract cos^2(x) on both sides we get the second option:
Which is a variation.
Now, let's divide both sides by cos^2(x).
Notice that the third expression in the options looks like this one, but the one on the right side is positive. The above expression is in did a variation of the Pythagorean identity, then the one written in the options (with the 1 instead of the -1) is incorrect, meaning that it is not a variation of the Pythagorean identity.
Concluding, the correct option is the third one.
If you want to learn more about the Pythagorean identity, you can read:
brainly.com/question/24287773
Answer:
$23.52
Step-by-step explanation:
So first you would have to find how much each one would be if you were buying one individual book. For that you would do 31.36/4 to get $7.84. Then since you found that for only 1 book, you would need to multiply that by 3 to get $23.52
Answer: the distance from one corner of the field to the other corner is 136 m
Step-by-step explanation:
The distance from one corner to the other corner is the diagonal and it
divides the field into two equal right angle triangles. The diagonal represents the hypotenuse of each right angle triangle. The length and width of the rectangle represents the adjacent and opposite sides of the right angle triangle. To determine the length of the diagonal, d, we would apply Pythagoras theorem which is expressed as
Hypotenuse² = opposite side² + adjacent side²
Therefore
d² = 110² + 80²
d² = 12100 + 6400 = 18500
d = √18500
d = 136 meters
(a) Using the table, give the values fo rthe inverse
1) original table of values:
x 1 2 3 4 5
f(x) 0 1 1 5 3
2) The inverse of the function is obtained by exchanging x and f(x), this is:
( x, f(x) ) → ( f(x), x)
3) So, the table of values of the inverse of the given function is:
x 0 1 1 5 3
f⁻¹ (x) 0 1 2 3 4
(b) Is the inverse a function?
No, the inverse is not a function, since the table of the inverse shows that the x -value 1 has two different images.
This ambigüity is opposite to the definition of a function, which requires that any input value has only one output. For that reason, the inverse is not a function. You cannot tell whether the image of 1 is 1 or 2, because both are images of the same value.
Answer:
it could be x= 10 and y=7? I think bc 17 can be split up into 10 and 7 or 9 and 8 etc.
