What would your response be during this type of situation? We already know you would give aid to the victims, so what else would you do? Would you try to get Cuba out where they had invaded Mexico? Or would you do nothing? Would you send troops to Mexico to help Mexico fight off the Cubans? What what military weapons?
Foreign policy spectrum, I assume, is Mexico's. So once you figured out what you would respond with, does it effect anything in their foreign policy? Would it be okay to do or not?
I believe the answer is D (However) because C (Therefore) would not make sense as it means ‘for that reason’ or ‘consequently’, B (Then) is a time connective so that would not make sense as a transition word to connect the paragraph, and A (now) could be referred to as informal depending on how you use it, and it is commonly used as an adverb of time.
I hope this helped
The bandwagon fallacy is in the insistence that good cities are good because they have rail.
Explanation:
The bandwagon fallacy is where the causation of something is confused as an effect.<u> It is the argument that because all the great cities of the country have light rail, our city too should have the same light rail system to be as good as them.</u>
This argument falls apart because the rail will not curb the problems that the passage itself talks about and then willfully ignores. I<u>n fact, bringing the rail to town will actually aggravate some of the issues mentioned here</u>. Which is why the argument becomes more weak.
A paragraph can be as long as it has to be. A paragraph is meant to contain an idea. It can be 20 sentences long or it can be 6 sentences long.
Even if you were to define that a paragraph is 6 sentences long, then comes the question, how long should a sentence be? 10 words? Or 25 words? And then comes how many letters the words should be on average. 2 letters per word on average? Or 7?
<span>So how long a paragraph can be is all relative...</span>
