One, it created two new states.
Two, it was passed because of the Missouri compromise, because the Missouri compromise was declared unconstitutional. It made it where States entering the Union had to be slave free.
Three, it caused small acts of terrorism in Kansas, most notably, the burning of Lawrence, K.S.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
THE ANWSER IS B
115
just took the test love yall
Explanation:
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>learning </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>Learning perspective</em><em> is described as one of the psychological approaches that generally signifies about the way experience and environment affects an individual's or animal's different actions and it encompasses social-cognitive and behaviorism learning theories.</em>
<em>The learning theory </em><em>was initially started with the work of a psychologist named </em><em>Albert Bandura</em><em> who has proposed the social learning theory.</em>
<em>As per the question, the therapist's suggestion most clearly reflects a learning perspective.</em>
<em> </em>
For Erikson, it is necessary to establish a personal identity to resolve the crisis of intimacy vs. isolation.
<h3>What is an intimacy crisis vs. isolation?</h3>
- It is a phase of human development.
- It is false that occurs at 19-40 years of age.
- It is a phase that determines the personal relationships between individuals.
According to Erikson, intimacy vs. isolation is the time when human beings seek interaction with other human beings. This interaction is developed by the desire to be part of a community and to have companions with whom I can establish an intimate interaction. When this type of interaction is not established, human beings tend to isolate themselves and not form groups.
For Erikson, the individual needs to determine their identity before entering intimacy vs. isolation. Because once identity is determined, the individual knows how to select groups of people most compatible with him or herself. Thus, intimacy vs. isolation is overcome with little difficulty and allows individuals to get through this phase with greater comfort.
Learn more about intimacy vs. isolation on the link:
brainly.com/question/25786631
#SPJ1
Anselm argued that an ideal being is important to exist. during this argument God is an excellent being thus he should exist that is understood because of the ontological argument. Guanilo thought this argument was absurd and he viewed the other. one thing doesn't exist simply because it's excellent and he used the instance of an ideal island. The island is ideal thus in step with Anselm's view it ought to exist however the island stop to exist thus Guanilo planned this argument to be reductio ad absurdum. as compared they each agree that as a result, of one thing is ideal it doesn't exist however in distinction saint believed that God was an exception to the present because God is a whole totally different matter and Gaunilo doesn't believe God is an exception to the present view, though he Guanilo believes in God he doesn't consider the ontological argument as proof of Gods existence.
