Giving a rat some food in the same half of the cage as the bar experimenters want it to press is an example of shaping.
<h3>What is
shaping?</h3>
A conditioning paradigm known as shaping is frequently used to analyze behavior in experiments. Differential reinforcement of subsequent approximations is the technique utilized. B. F. Skinner first used pigeons to demonstrate it before expanding to include dogs, dolphins, humans, and other species.
By encouraging behaviors that advance toward the desired behavior, shaping affects behavior (operant response). Organisms can be trained to behave in ways that would only sometimes if ever, happen naturally through shaping.
Methods of Shaping Behavior:
- Positive reinforcement.
- Negative reinforcement.
- Punishment.
- Extinction.
- Schedules of reinforcement.
To know more about B. F. Skinner refer to: brainly.com/question/802392
#SPJ4
<span>Since Elizabeth lived in fifteenth century belgium and she had symptoms of what would now be diagnosed as schizophrenia plus the fact that she could not care for herself and her family abandoned her, Elizabeth will most likely die and she could die in many ways.
15th century Belgium is known as the battleground of Europe. Living in this place with or without </span>schizophrenia will leave you dead with either 3rd degree burns or stray bullet in the head. Plus the people in this time are fond of witch-hunting. If you show signs of abnormality, they might think you are a witch or possessed and eitherway, you'll be killed or might unfortunately die in exorcism. Poor Elizabeth.
I believe the answer is: <span>Telling and giving understanding are two different things.
Mink is valuable, coon is not, even though both are fur.
Janie implies that telling would be taken by people simply as passing sentence and would most likely forget it in a short period of time.
Making people understand on the other hand would most likely change people's behavior to the better.</span>
Answer:
U.S. dity notes, made from a blend of 75 percent cotton and 25 percent linen, may be more attractive to bacteria than other countries' currency.
Explanation:
brainliest me please thanks
There is no right or wrong, which distinguishes Christian ethics from strictly scientific ethics for a number of reasons.
<h3>What distinctions exist between Christian and scientific ethics?</h3>
The sciences have been and continue to be supported by Christianity. Many clergy have been involved in the sciences, and it has been widely used in the construction of schools, universities, and hospitals. Christian ethics is not a theory, model, framework, or intellectual creation of either humans or the divine. Christian ethics are fundamentally distinct from those of all other world religions. Each ethical philosophy offers concepts (propositions) regarding what is right and wrong. These concepts are either human conceptions or they are said to be divine. Scientific and religious explanations can in reality conflict when religious explanations explicitly make use of or presuppose empirical truths and when these claims are known to be true. Religion deals with the spiritual and supernatural, whereas science studies the natural world; as a result, the two can complement one another. There need not be a tension between religious belief and the scientific view of evolution, according to statements made by several religious organizations.
To know more about Christian ethics and scientific ethics, click here:
brainly.com/question/21842202
#SPJ4
