The correct answer is a<em> referendum</em>. This a juridical procedure in which it is submitted to vote of the population a law or a particular matter relevant for the govern. This mean obtains the popular consultation. Another name for this is the plebiscite.
<em>A province</em> is an area of specialized knowledge, interest or responsibility. Also refers to an administrative division of a country.
<em>The Quebec act </em>knows as the British North America Quebec Act was signed in 1774 and determined the procedures of governance in the province of Quebec (Canada) regarding its territory, religious matters, civil law among other issues.
Finally, <em>the Brexit</em> is a political act, (means Britain exit) from the European Union. Took place in 2006, and was done through a referendum where the people were asked if they wanted to continue being part of the European Union or not. 52% of the population voted in favor of leaving the Union.
False i believe is your answer
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Congressman has to respond to the Big Pizza Lobby taking these considerations in mind.
Congressman has to realize the impact of the presence of this big "company" in the market. Not only for other industries that cannot compete with this huge company but the impact it has on consumers.
The congressman would propose the kind of bill that benefits free trade, competence, and benefits consumers in a free market.
The big company is not going to stay "arms-folded." The company is going to hire lobbyists to negotiate with congressmen in order to promote its particular agendas and personal interests.
Of course, the big company wants to change the rules against it, and modify them to facilitate their interests. The negotiations can make legislators doubt or rethink a regulation. That is when Congressman has to think to support the interests of citizens, who were the ones who took him/her to office in the elections. So congressmen serve the people, not large companies.
What would be the answer choices, So I could answer your question better
Answer:
give the work back to the people
Explanation:
Giving the work back to the people tend to be considered as a high risk but high reward approach from the management's perspective.
If this style work, the managers will have a much easier time since they can completely trust the workers to make decisions without relying too much of them. But, if this style does not work, it will be really hard for the managers to connect the accountability when something goes wrong.