Answer:
The ancestors of mammals diverged from ancient synapsids (reptiles).
Explanation:
The mammals have known to be evolved from a group of reptiles. These group of reptiles were known as synapsids. In fact, some scientists consider mammals as the only living synapsids. The close relativity between reptiles and mammals can hence be seen because they have common ancestors. The synapsids were known to inhabit the earth during the Permian Period.
The scientists, however, do not know from which reptiles exactly did the first mammals grow.
Answer:
a. Lochotrophozora
Explanation:
Molecular research and studies complement morphological research and improve our awareness and knowledge of evolutionary history. Previously, morphological studies could only reveal to us the variations and distinctions, but molecular studies and phylogeny have enabled us to pinpoint the fundamental mechanism of this variation on a genetic level, as well as locate it down to evolutionary lineage, which has led to more enhanced genealogy and evolutionary studies.
However, the group of organisms that best reflects and represents this kind of change is: Lochotrophozora
Answer:
No!
Explanation:
Safety precautions must be taken with this procedure. Such as, protective gear, bacteria should not be mixed with other substances!
<em>Hello!</em>
<h3>The Answer Is: <em>Bacteria and Archaea are comprised exclusively of microorganisms; plants, mammals, and microorganisms such as fungi and protists are contained in the Eukarya. Because of their lack of a nucleus, the Bacteria and Archaea were grouped together and called Prokaryotes, but the Archaea are more closely connected to the Eukaryotes than to the Bacteria. The cell walls of bacteria contain a compound called peptidoglycan, while the cell walls of archaea do not. Archaea and bacteria also vary because the composition of the cell membranes of archaea is peculiar and does not contain the same lipids, or fats, present in other species' cell membranes.</em></h3>
<em />
<u><em>Thank you for asking this question!
</em></u>
<u><em>
</em></u>
<u><em>
It would be greatly appreciated if you thanked me and marked me as the brainliest!
</em></u>
<u><em>
</em></u>
<u><em>
Have an amazing day.</em></u>
Let's analyze this.
Martin Luther King rose his name through the boycott, so option C is not the answer. The movement was taken to the supreme court, so option A is not the answer and the movement still DID NOT end the racial segregation, which eliminate option D
So the answer is : B the boycott started a massive nonviolent movement
Hope this helps