B, because the average customer would want 2
Answer:
A) leveraging new core competencies to improve current market position.
Explanation:
As is given in the scenario, the people that the company Ancho is trying to get are <em>potential customers</em> rather than existing, hence they cannot be said to be building new core competencies <em>to protect and extend current market position</em>. That would have been the case if they were trying to keep those that were already customers to the company.
Ancho cannot also be said to be <em>redeploying existing core competencies to compete in future markets </em>because they are actually acquiring new competencies in electric car manufacturing which was not their original line of business.
There is also no case of <em>unlearning existing core competencies </em>because Anchor has deployed existing competencies in developing a hybrid car rather than just an electric one.
Hence Anchor is trying to get new customers while keeping the old ones and has made a car that will appeal to both existing and potential customers to improve current market position.
Answer:
break even point in units:
- a = 11,700
- b = 46,800
- c = 35,100
Explanation:
beer mugs contribution margin expected sales
a $5 25,000
b $4 100,000
c $3 50,000
fixed costs = $351,000
if the sales proportion remains the same, we can assume a bundle of products = 1a + 4b + 3c (1 for every 25,000 units) whose contribution margin = $5 + $16 + $9 = $30
break even point = fixed costs / bundle's contribution margin = $351,000 / $30 = 11,700 bundles
break even point in units:
a = 11,700
b = 11,700 x 4 = 46,800
c = 11,700 x 3 = 35,100
Answer:
$182,083
Explanation:
The computation of the total assets by considering the total assets turnover is shown below:
Total assets turnover = Sales ÷ total assets
2.4 = $415,000 ÷ total assets
So, the total assets equal to
= $415,000 ÷ 2.4
= $172,917
So, the assets is reduced by
= Year-end total assets - calculated assets
= $355,000 - $172,917
= $182,083
Answer:
$546,750
Explanation:
Sales 2,498,000
COGS (1,376,000)
gross profit 1, 112,000
S&A salaries (219,000)
other S&A (346,000)
underapplied MO (10,250) *
net income 536.750
*we need to compare the actual voerhead with the applied overhead:
<u>actual overhead:</u> 176,000 + 420,000 = 596,000
<u>applied overhead:</u>
overhead rate:
568,000 / 32,000 = 17.75
33,000 x 17.75 = 585.750
overhead
<u>debit credit</u>
596,000 585,750
10,250 underapplied overhead
As the applied was lower it is underapplied we need to recognzie more cot thus, the net income decrease.
