Answer:
no enough evidence to draw up a conclusion
Step-by-step explanation:
Data:
let: 
= decay after 2 weeks
= decay after 16 weeks
Making the hypotheses:
Null hypothesis; 
the deviation = 0.05
the standard difference = 4
Conditions:
The normal distribution curve can be plotted on a graph and the plot shows that the distribution is a skewed distribution.
Then,
Therefore, it can be concluded that 0.1983 > 0.05. This presents our failure to reject the null hypothesis.
Thus, there is not enough evidence to conclude that polyester decays more in less than 2 weeks.
Answer:
4/9
Step-by-step explanation:
There are 9 letters in the word zookeeper. 4 of those letters are either a k or an e. So the probability is 4/9.
The problem above is an example of conditional probability. From the name itself, it gives you a condition that a certain event has already happen, or is sure to happen. In this case, the probability would be 100% or 1. The condition says that the probability is 100% if the packages are more than 3. Since, 4 is considered to be more than 3, then the probability is 100%.
5x+1(6-4) = +1(5x6)-(5x)
this would be a hard question to answer but i think i can do it ((( nNOTTTT))))
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
I am assuming the tank starts empty. It means that in 1 hour the tank has half that water, or 3600 gallons. And the good thing of lines passing through 0.0 is that the value at 1 IS the slope we need. ie 3600.
At this point it's easy to find that if in 2 hours it filled 1/10th of the tank, in 20 hours the tank will be full.
Graph done with paint, obviously not to scale.
