Answer:
It's called "checks & balance"
Explanation:
this was enacted so the power to govern is shared, not just 2 1 group. that way any group opposed to a law has a "say-so" in the outcome of any law or rule..like Congress has to vote on a law the president approves.
Savvy you light up my world like nobody else that what’s makes you beautiful
Answer:
He opposed sending American delegates to the Congress of Panama.
Explanation:
i had the same questions and this one was correct :)
Yes.
Even though democracy in theory must be something almost completely free of influence, all the influence of the people who have more power in society is still great, and it increases as social inequality grows
In situations where the population is in favor of deconcentrating income and wealth, this will has not found support in the political arena. On the one hand, there are those who insist on denying the problem, stating that the growth of social inequality does not produce adverse effects for society; on the other, there are those who declare that nothing can be done about the matter, since the culprits would be the <u>“market forces”</u>, neutral and impersonal economic mechanisms.