Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
Answer:
я действительно не знаю, пожалуйста, не удаляйте этот вопрос
Explanation:
Answer:
<u>Because of the nature of the items</u>
Explanation:
It seems <em>illogical </em>to conclude that the government would able to accurately track down deadly meat out of a pool of several tons of processed meat.
However, to determine defective toys or other non-meat products from stores would require little technical issues, whereas to examine meatpacking companies may require gathering expert dieticians to determine what meat should be categorized as "deadly meat", etc.
It influenced the life of the colonies because different places could grow different things. It's kind of like diversity, but in the 1700's.
Adopted by the second continental u.s by john Dickinson on July 5 and submitted to king George on July 8 1775 in an attempt to asset the rights of the colonialists while maintain the loyalty the have to the British <span />
