The best choice is option one, although that is not fully correct. But because an author is present, the name comes first.
Answer:
Initiative versus guilt.
Explanation:
<u>Erik Erickson proposed a theory of psychological development in which he categorized development from infant to adulthood, into eight stages. </u>
Kristi's behavior in the question can be categorized in the third stage of Erik's psychological development i.e., "Initiative versus guilt".
In this stage of Erik's theory, which spans from 3-5 years, the child begins to take initiative. when children's take initiative they began to develop an interpersonal skill. But if parents squelched at their children during this stage they will develop a sense of guilt which will stop children from taking initiative and will restrict themselves.
So, the correct answer is "Initiative versus guilt.
Hi i can’t see the question can u copy and paste and reply to me
The correct answer for 1 is <span>D) The reader and the speaker share the same essence.
The reader and the speaker and all other people on the planet share the same essence. This is a very transcendentalist thought that we are all connected and are one and the same soul and should not take that lightly. Here ti isn't about physical even though atoms are a physical thing.
The correct answer for 2 is </span><span>D) Loafing is permissible, especially when studying nature.
Loafing didn't have a negative connotation back then, it simply referred to relaxing and dwelling on something, it wasn't just about being lazy. Loafing is permissible and his watching the plants is making him find a deeper meaning in life and in nature.
The correct answer for 3 is </span><span>D) These lines suggest that national identity is forged through having deep ancestral roots in a place.
His national identity of loving America which is also seen in his other poems stems form the idea that his forefathers and their forefathers were born there and they all shared the same experience of the land and nature and it is now his thing. </span>
Answer: 11.
Explanation: I think it's talking about 4 years earlier so then she was 7. 4 years later she'd be 11 and Darren would be 7.
