What was the goal of the committees of correspondence?

History

1 answer:

Zinaida [17]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The goal of the Committees of Correspondence throughout the Thirteen Colonies was to inform voters of the common threat they faced from their mother country – Britain.

Explanation:

The Committees of Correspondence promoted manufacturing in the Thirteen Colonies and advised colonists not to buy goods imported from Britain.

Hope this helps :)

You might be interested in

PLEASE HELP FAST!!! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!

weeeeeb [17]

Federal court case that dealt with the formation of a federal bank and a series of individual banks. The case of McCulloch v. Maryland started through a series of important events that involved a number of laws. The following laws will allow you to understand what was going on with the McCulloch v. Maryland case.

In 1816, the United States Congress passed an Act that allowed Federal Banks to be located and to operate within individual states in the U.S. Two years later, in 1816, the state of Maryland passed an Act that placed all banks and financial institutions that operated in the state under the taxation model of Maryland. This law thus made banks and other financial institutions in the state, including all federal banks, to pay Maryland state tax. A year after the passing of this law, McCulloch v. Maryland was heard.

McCulloch v. Maryland: The Case Profile

The case of McCulloch v. Maryland was heard in 1819. The case was tried in the Supreme Court of the United States. Andrew McCulloch was the defendant in McCulloch v. Maryland. McCulloch was the appointed manager of the Federal Bank located in Baltimore, Maryland. McCulloch refused to pay the state tax imposed by Maryland; he believed that federal banks were not subject to state taxation.

In McCulloch v. Maryland, the state was the plaintiff. The state of Maryland believed that the federal bank should pay state taxes because they were operating on their land and using their resources.

McCulloch v. Maryland: The Verdict

The United States Supreme Court in McCulloch v. Maryland ruled in favor of the defendant, Andrew McCulloch. The United States Supreme Court in McCulloch v. Maryland ruled in favor of the defendant because the Necessary and Proper Clause of the United States Constitution stated that the Federal Government was permitted to operate banks within individual states without paying taxes. The decision in McCulloch v. Maryland created a precedent; it led to a number of future decisions involving taxation issues and the federal government.

COMMENTS

2 comments

No related posts.

Share

RELATED ARTICLES

Roper v. Simmons

Thomas Jefferson

20% of HIV-Infected Youth were Unaware of Status

Alabama Forms

Alaska Forms

Arizona Forms

Arkansas Forms

California Forms

Colorado Forms

Connecticut Forms

District Of Columbia Forms

Delaware Forms

Florida Forms

Georgia Forms

Idaho Forms

Hawaii Forms

Illinois Forms

Indiana Forms

Iowa Forms

Kansas Forms

Kentucky Forms

Louisiana Forms

Maine Forms

Maryland Forms

Massachusetts Forms

Michigan Forms

Minnesota Forms

Mississippi Forms

Missouri Forms

Montana Forms

Nebraska Forms

Nevada Forms

New Hampshire Forms

New Jersey Forms

New Mexico Forms

New York Forms

North Carolina Forms

North Dakota Forms

Ohio Forms

Oklahoma Forms

Oregon Forms

Pennsylvania Forms

Rhode Island Forms

South Carolina Forms

South Dakota Forms

Tennessee Forms

Texas Forms

Utah Forms

Vermont Forms

Virginia Forms

Washington Forms

West Virginia Forms

Wisconsin Forms

Wyoming Forms

Alabama Codes & Statutes

Alaska Codes & Statutes

Arizona Codes & Statutes

Arkansas Codes & Statutes

California Codes & Statutes

Connecticut Codes & Statutes

Delaware Codes & Statutes

District of Columbia Codes & Statutes

Florida Codes & Statutes

Georgia Codes & Statutes

Hawaii Codes & Statutes

Idaho Codes & Statutes

Illinois Codes & Statutes

Indiana Codes & Statutes

Iowa Codes & Statutes

Kansas Codes & Statutes

Kentucky Codes & Statutes

Louisiana Codes & Statutes

Maine Codes & Statutes

Maryland Codes & Statutes

Massachusetts Codes & Statutes

Michigan Codes & Statutes

Minnesota Codes & Statutes

Mississippi Codes & Statutes

Missouri Codes & Statutes

Montana Codes & Statutes

Nebraska Codes & Statutes

Nevada Codes & Statutes

New Hampshire Codes & Statutes

New Jersey Codes & Statutes

New Mexico Codes & Statutes

New York Codes & Statutes

North Carolina Codes & Statutes

North Dakota Codes & Statutes

Ohio Codes & Statutes

Oklahoma Codes & Statutes

Oregon Codes & Statutes

Pennsylvania Codes & Statute

3 0

3 years ago

History of voting rights in the 1960s

gulaghasi [49]

Answer:

It was largely the will of the white power structure of the various communities that dictated whether or not blacks were able to participate.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

What were the significant changes in american art and literature in the first half of the nineteenth century?

Olenka [21]

Many scholars argue that the rise of the middle/operating magnificence, “with its emphasis on social fluidity and person self-dedication,” led to expanded literacy, reading, and hence manufacturing and consumption of novel-like texts (Lumen mastering).

Americans had been divided by means of sectionalism and slavery, however, they have been united by nationalism and an optimistic notion of the possibility of improving themselves and society. those ideas were expressed in and bolstered with the aid of American artwork and literature.

Even though many early American settlers were well-examined and knowledgeable, maximum writings had been non-public journals or political essays. folks art, which includes signs, flags, and quilts was not unusual. America started to increase its very own literary and inventive voice in the early-to-mid 1800s. American literature is the body of written works produced in the English language in America.

Learn more about American literature here

brainly.com/question/1560852

#SPJ4

8 0

2 years ago

Who was the leader of the federalist party?

algol13

Okay, so here are the leaders according to my bad memory...John Jay, Rufus King,DeWitt Clinton, Alexander Hamilton, John Adams, and I forgot the last one. I dont know, maybe Im wrong. Good luck! ;D

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who was Stephen A. Douglas? How did he help ensure that the Compromise of 1850 passed through Congress?

12345 [234]

Divisions over slavery in territory gained in the Mexican-American (1846-48). War was resolved in the Compromise of 1850. It consisted of laws admitting California as a free state, creating Utah and New Mexico territories with the question of slavery in each to be determined by popular sovereignty, settling a Texas-New Mexico boundary dispute in the former’s favor, ending the slave trade in Washington, D.C., and making it easier for southerners to recover fugitive slaves.
Play videoSound Smart: Compromise of 18502minPlay videoWhat Was the Missouri Compromise?3minPlay videoSound Smart: The Kansas-Nebraska Act2min The compromise was the last major involvement in national affairs of Senators Henry Clay of Kentucky, Daniel Webster of Massachusetts, and John C. Calhoun of South Carolina, all of whom had had exceptional careers in the Senate. Calhoun died the same year, and Clay and Webster two years later.Did You Know?One of the legislative bills that were passed as part of the Compromise of 1850 was a new version of the Fugitive Slave Act.At first, Clay introduced an omnibus bill covering these measures. Calhoun attacked the plan and demanded that the North cease its attempts to limit slavery. By backing Clay in a speech delivered on March 7, Webster antagonized his onetime abolitionist supporters. Senator William H. Seward of New York opposed to compromise and earned an undeserved reputation for radicalism by claiming that a “higher law” than the Constitution required the checking of slavery. President Zachary Taylor opposed the compromise, but his death on July 9 made procompromise vice president Millard Fillmore of New York president. Nevertheless, the Senate defeated the omnibus bill.Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois then split the omnibus proposal into individual bills so that congressmen could abstain or vote on each, depending on their interests. They all passed, and Fillmore signed them. The compromise enabled Congress to avoid sectional and slavery issues for several years.

8 0

3 years ago