Answer:
Interview
Explanation:
An interview is an official conversation between an interviewer and interviewee. The purpose of the interview is to asses whether the interviewee qualifies to hold the position. The interview process usually takes place on the employer premises. Apart from academic and work experience, the recruiting manager assesses other qualities that would make the candidate suitable to work in that organization. Such traits may include teamwork and leadership.
When conducting interviews, an employer will invite several qualified candidates. The interviewer or the interviewing panel scores each candidate and selects the best. The interview presents the candidate with an opportunity to learn fine details about a potential employer. Specific detail about the job, such as the terms and conditions, are disclosed.
Answer:
1)decrease 2)increase
Explanation:
Because the money come in the business
Answer:
groupthink
Explanation:
In team discussions and debates, groupthink is a common phenomenon where team members tend to agree with others without a constructive discussion filled with arguments. It is very common when an authoritative person (manager) is leading the discourse of discussion.
In this example, the reached consensus is an example of groupthink, since the team members did not critically evaluate the troublesome issue.
According to the Uniform Commercial Code's interpretation of an open quantity term, if the quantity term is left open in a contract for the sale of goods courts generally have no basis for determining a remedy.
<h3>What do you mean by Uniform Commercial Code?</h3>
The uniform Commercial code states that a sale consists of the passing of title from the seller to the buyer for a price.
According to the Uniform Commercial code's interpretation of an open quantity term, if the quantity term is left open in a contract for the sale of goods, courts have no basis for the determination of remedy.
Learn more about uniform commercial code here:
brainly.com/question/8476938
#SPJ1
Answer:
b. did not know of the reward when he returned the dog.
Explanation:
Laredo advertises for getting his dog back. This does not infer that the dog will only be returned when the reward will be paid.
Miguel did not know about the reward, so the reward in this case is not mandatory to be paid, but if Laredo initiates the reward himself, that can be accepted.
This is a clear demonstration of being kind and get what you know.
So if you do not know the facts, you are on fault.
