Answer:
b. An increase of $15 million
Explanation:
The computation of the cash impact of the change in working capital is shown below:
As we know that
Working capital = Current assets - current liabilities
So, the change in working capital is
= Increase in current assets - increased in current liabilities
= $40 million - $25 million
= $15 million
Hence, the b option is correct
Answer:
wait I am going to tell u the answer
Explanation:
Mmmmm
Answer:
a) Absolute Value Inequality => Absolute(0 + y) < 2
b) -2 < y < 2
Which means, Johnson Family has to live within the range of -2 to +2 from the fire department. Otherwise, they will have to pay 500 USD as increased deductible.
Explanation:
<u><em>Johnson Family has to live within the range of -2 to +2 from the fire department.
</em></u>
<em>a) Absolute Value Equation:</em>
Absolute(0 + y) < 2
where y represent the location of the new house and 0 represents the location of the fire department.
Furthermore,
<em>Absolute(0 + y) < 2 = (0 + x) < 2 when (0 + y) is +ve. </em>
and
<em>Absolute(0+y) <2 = -(0 + x) < 2 when (0 + y) is -ve.
</em>
b) When (0 + y) is +ve,
we have, (0 + y) < 2.
<em>Solving for y and subtracting 0 from both sides. </em>
0-0 + y < 2 - 0
<em>y < 2</em>
and when (0 + y) is -ve,
<em>we have, - (0 + y) < 2.
</em>
Solving for y:
- 0 - y < 2
multiplying negative from both sides
<em>y > - 2</em>
<em>So, we have -2 < y < 2 </em>
<em>Johnson Family has to live within the range of -2 to +2 from the fire department. Otherwise, they will have to pay 500 USD as increased deductible. </em>
Answer:
The appropriate approach is "Principal-agent problems".
Explanation:
- A contradiction of objectives or priority between someone individual or organization as well as the authorized accompanying documents to operate over its behalf is considered as Principal-agent problem.
- The possession of a commodity or fundamental assigns immediate supervision of that resource to some other agency may transpire in whatsoever circumstance.
Answer:
0%
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question, where we saw coach Seib has 90% faster breaking her triglyceride Levels while working, when sitting, she has a 0% of breaking her triglyceride Levels because no movement, there will be no breakdown in the triglyceride Levels