Answer:
Dear * insert BF name,
I have known that you truanted classes yesterday/ 2 days ago/ a week ago/... Me, on one hand, know that you are tired and lazy to attend classes and I understand your opinion towards the subjects today, on the other hand, I think you should've attended at least one or two of them, Mathes and * insert the subject you think is important... ( author-chan POV : after that, you should continue writing your letter using these points:
- Tell your friend about how you felt during your classes without him/her
I recommend you tell him/her the summary of the classes you have that day, but ignore it if you are too lazy to do the part.
- tell your friend why you dont think ditching class is good, for example, 'skipping class means losing a bunch of knowledge' or write it yourself.
- at last, tell your friend to quit the idea of ditching more classes in your way. If it was me, it'll be like this:
After all the reasons I told you, I don't want you to skip class again, and I wish to see you at school after your suspended time. Please quit the idea of truanting classes ( add this if you want -> unless you want me to stop being your friend. )
Explanation:
this is hard work, I want you to offer us a bigger amount of points as a payback.
Answer:
C.
Most can be approached by determining whether an idea or fact is accurate.
Explanation:
Edge 2020
The answers are:
"In these opening lines, the reader is presented with a narrator who wants to kill the old man because of his eye. The author uses the lines to present a CHARACTER VERSUS SELF conflict. Based on this excerpt, this stage of the plot is most likely to occur in THE CLIMAX.
All of this because the idea entered in the man´s mind and haunted him day and night, that´s when the conflict with himself started.
And the exposition of the "Tell tale" is when the narrator insists that he´s not insane. The rising action is when he is gathering the courage to kill the old man. The climax is when he kills the old man. And the falling action is when the narrator hears the old man´s heart beating.
He wanted to convey that indifference is worse than hate or anger. One could be angry at injustice or hate evil, violent acts Indifference is the absence of compassion and implies something worse than outright hate; indifference implies a lack of acknowledgment. Being indifferent to another's suffering is like saying, 'you're suffering is not even worth my consideration.' Wiesel speaks from his experience of the Holocaust, but this could be applied to any situation in history in which the world was indifferent; in which the world willfully refused to acknowledge suffering of others for any number of unjustifiable reasons: 1) out of sight, out of mind, 2) passivity, laziness, 3) an untried feeling of hopelessness ('what could i possibly do?'), 4) selfishness. When Wiesel speaks of indifference he also means ignorance in 3 senses: 1) ignorant as in lacking sensitivity, 2) lacking knowledge and 3) ignoring. The 'perils of indifference' could be described as the 'the terrible outcomes of ignoring atrocities. Apply this to anything today, where suffering is ignored by indifferent people and governments. (i.e., Darfur, Haiti). The peril of indifference would be to allow (allow by ignoring = indifference) an atrocity like the Holocaust to occur again.
