Answer:
Option B "functional strategy
" is the correct option.
Explanation:
- A functional approach or strategy is necessarily connected to operations and maintenance-level decision-making, also recognized as tactical changes.
- Those same tactical decisions were mostly applied to different operational departments such as business, research as well as development, human resources, warehousing, logistic support, amongst others.
And therefore this strategy demonstrates best the specific situation.
Answer:
Answer explained
Explanation:
The case is about the defamation claimed by plaintiff on the defendant on the basis of race remark of g a y or bisexual by third party information. This ultimately broken the relationship of two person.
I think that court should ultimately found that the accusations of homosexuality or bisexuality amounted to defamation per se because of the following reason:
- The Race Remark on the plaintiff by the defendant.
- It is a slander per se.
- This remark impute to the commission of the crime of sodomy.
- It is implying Unchastity that means Exposing Plaintiff to Public Hatred. This spoils the life of the plaintiff.
Answer:
This is an escrow transaction. An escrow is an arrangement where a third party (ABC Escrow) holds funds for a given transaction between other two parties.
The Van Horns are the grantees in this transaction.
The escrow is responsible for the safe keeping of the funds, in order to avoid any type of loss or fraud.
Answer:
demand; inelastic
Explanation:
Price discrimination is when a seller charges different prices for the same product in different markets. Price discrimination is usually practised by monopolists. The aim of price discrimination is to eliminate consumer surplus.
A seller would usually charge a higher price to a consumer whose demand is price inelastic. This means that the quantity demanded is less sensitive to changes in price.
If the seller charges a higher price to a consumer whose demand is price elastic, the consumer would reduce the quantity demanded as a result of the rise in price and the total revenue of the seller would fall.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
The remaining useful life of the asset is = 10 - 3 = 7 years
Explanation:
The straight line method of depreciation charges a constant depreciation expense through out the useful life of the asset. The formula for depreciation expense under this method is,
Depreciation expense = (Cost - Salvage value) / Estimated useful life of the asset
Plugging in the values for depreciation expense per year, cost and salvage value, we can calculate the total expected life of the asset.
5000 = (53000 - 3000) / estimated useful life of the asset
estimated useful life of the asset = 50000 / 5000
estimated useful life of the asset = 10 years
As the accumulated depreciation balance is of 15000, the depreciation for 15000/5000 = 3years has been charged.
The remaining useful life of the asset is = 10 - 3 = 7 years
