Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
The question
does not pose any options to choose from, I found the exercise and here are the
options:
<span>
a. Determining what clothes to wear to the prom
b. Deciding whether to scream "fire" in a crowded movie theater
c. Determining how she should cook macaroni and cheese
d. Deciding whether she should sleep at night</span>
<span>
The correct choice is "A", Determining what clothes to wear to the
prom".
All the other options lack the element of pressure from peer groups or
social pressure. Prom night is the occasion when everyone wants to get other's
attention and for that sole reason large amount is money is also spent.</span>
Anvil is a heavy steel block that is used as a surface to hammer metal
The answer would be
The interpretation that the psychologist gave her is the latent content.
I may be wrong, but I hope this helps :)
Here's a better idea. PLAN AHEAD, CHILD. I've been in your place. It's rough, but work on it every chance you have before hand! It doesn't pay off to be lazy.
