Question

Why does a more participative management style ("tipping the pyramid over") lead to greater responsiveness to customers’ needs, increased accountability, and more innovative solutions to challenges than a hierarchical "command and control" structure? What particular factors do you believe led UGG/AU to be pioneers in ERM? Was it industry/company/history/circumstances? Was it a changed organizational "culture"? Was it good management?

Answer 1

Answer:

For example, for inclusive companies, including people with a certain disability is successful to the extent that a change in company culture is achieved. The most complicated obstacles to hiring people with a certain disability are in the myths and barriers that have been raised regarding what has to do with disability.

Explanation:

The hiring of people with disabilities is a step towards breaking down myths and barriers. This must be followed by a systematic step of training and sensitization of all company personnel. Everyone's participation in the different phases of the inclusion process is essential. Said participation must produce as a result of direct executive direction, coming from the highest levels of the company, but generated as the product of training, conviction and awareness.

Answer 2

Inclusive and participatory management practices are the most effective in today's society. The indices show that companies that adopt this style of management achieve continuous improvements throughout the organizational process. Organizational culture focused on employee well-being ensures a positive culture and this influences them to do their job more effectively. It also increases security, pride in being part of that company, and values.