Johnson was considered that there would be a communist takeover in Southeast Asia if the United States left Vietnam.
It led to the industrial revolution because Protestants were part of the reformation. If you think about it, it can include the fact that the Industrial revolution was when industries were being built and everybody was manufacturing things. The reformation had lead to the industrial revolution because it had inspired everybody to manufacture items. Hope that helped!!!!
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there no options attached or any specific reading, we can say the following.
The key ideals and provisions of the tribal treaties of this era (such as the Point No Point Treaty), were the displacement of the Native American Indians tribes from their territories to support white settlement, as was the case of the Point No Point Treaty that was signed on January 26, 1855.
Let'set this case as an example. Isaac Stevens was the Governor of the Washington territory. He wanted the land of the Kitsap Peninsula. So he had to negotiate a deal with three different tribes; the Skokomish, the S'Klallam, and the Chimakum. The Native American Indian tribe's leaders expressed their concerns and were reluctant to accept. Stevens had to give them a reservation with fishing and hunting rights, where they could grow crops and live with their families, in exchange for that Kitsap territory.
1- The correct answer is A. Samuel Houston was the Texan leader who most supported the annexation to the United States. In fact, he was President of the Republic of Texas twice, and from his position he always fought for annexation, unlike others like Mirabeau Lamar. In addition, it is stated that Houston went to Texas sent by President Andrew Jackson to achieve annexation.
2- Houston argued that the annexation had to be carried out to respect the will and right of the Texan people (which were made up of American settlers) to decide the legal status of their territory. This argument is related to the right of self-determination of peoples, which I consider valid since it's theb population who has the power to decide on their future and that of the territory they inhabit and administer, not being the states able to make decisions contrary to the people and their will.
