Answer:
Parliament responded by enforcing the Coercive Acts of 1774.
Explanation:
When the Boston Tea Party took place, Parliament was furious. Hence, they passed the Coercive Acts of 1774, which included 4 different statements:
The Boston Port Act stated that until damages from the Boston Tea Party were paid off, the Boston Ports would be closed.
The Massachusetts Government Act restricted Massachusetts, stating that democratic town meetings turned the government council into an appointed body.
The Administration of Justice Act stated that any British Official was immune to criminal prosecution in Massachusetts.
The Quartering Act required colonists to house British soldiers on demand, and possibly using their private homes as a last resort.
Those are the 4 Technical Acts of the Coercive Acts of 1774, but there's a 5th act that correlates.
The Quebec Act extended freedom of of worship to Catholics in Canada, as well as letting Canadians carry on with their judicial system. It was added to the Coercive Acts of 1774 later after the Acts were passed, and it enraged the Sons of Liberty that much more.
➡️The Habsburg Period in Spain is the collection of events between the 16th and 17th centuries.✔️
➡️It begins with the Holy elected emperor of the Roman Empire, Fredrick the III.✔️
➡️The Habsburgs, of Austrian descent, was the dominant ruling family at the time; the most significant rulers are noted as Charles I and Phillip II.✔️
It is C because the men were out to fight the war and in that time only men could have jobs, so when the men left the women had to take over and their role was so important because they were making everything all the soldiers needed like food and ammunition.
A sit down strike is a strike which has a somewhat nontraditional nature as it is when employees take "illegal" possession of their workplace by committing to a strike at their work stations. Furthermore, employees 'sit-down' at their station but do not work. It is considered a form of civil disobedience. This differs from a traditional strike as in traditional strikes workers walk off their jobs and therefore can be replaced whereas a sit-down strike causes work stations to be occupied and therefore does not allow employees to be replaced easily.
