Answer:
b. 300,000 shares being sold is an issuer transaction and the 200,000 shares being sold is a non-issuer transaction.
Explanation:
A non-issuer transaction is a transaction that does not directly benefit an issuer or it was not directly executed to benefit an issuer.
According to the Uniform State Law, an entity involved in the sales of certificates of interest, leases, mining titles among others is officially exempted from being labelled as an issuer. Hence, the entity (officers of the firm) in the question are non-issuer brokers.
Specifically, when the sales of stock are carried out by someone or an individual who is not a registered stockbroker, that individual officially becomes what is called 'a non-issuer broker-dealer'. The implication is that such a transaction is to be exempted from the registration requirements of the Security Exchange Commission.
In this question, since the issuer newly issued 300,000 shares while the remaining 200,000 in the proposed combination was offered by Officers of the firm - non-issuer broker-dealers. The Law states that it must be separated to show that 300,000 shares are sold in an issuer transaction (Primary) directly involving an official issuer while 200,000 shares are sold in a non-issuer transaction (Secondary).
The lowest fees for investors are typically found in a type of passive investing called the Index Fund investing.
Answer:
$238000
Explanation:
The computation of the carrying value of the bond is shown below:
Given that
Face Value of Bonds = $250,000
Proceeds from issuance of bonds = $235,000
Before that we need to compute the following things
Now
Discount on Bonds Payable = Face Value of Bonds - Proceeds from issuance of bonds
= $250,000 - $235,000
= $15,000
Life of Bonds = 10 years
Now
Discount on Bonds amortized annually = Discount on Bonds Payable ÷ Life of Bonds
= $15,000 ÷ 10
= $1,500
Now
Discount amortized is
= Discount on Bonds amortized annually × expired life
= $1,500 × 2
= $3,000
Finally
Carrying Value of Bonds = Issue Price + Discount amortized
= $235,000 + $3.000
= $238,000
Answer:
<u>True</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Remember, no business operations would exist if there aren't any identified customer needs to solve.
Also, we need to bear in mind that Operations management activities are done in any business in other to efficiently (profitably) process raw materials, labor, etc into the goods and services needed by consumers.
Answer:
$77,500
Explanation:
The computation of the cash disbursement for June month is shown below:
= June purchase × month percentage given + May purchase × following month percentage + April purchase × second following month percentage
= $60,000 × 25% +$ 90,000 × 50% + $70,000 × 25%
= $15,000 + $45,000 + $17,500
= $77,500
The remaining percentage would be
= 100% - 25% - 50%
= 25%
