He was elected in D. 1860.
Hope that helped you.
Answer:
Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option B.
The Bill of Rights did not apply at the state level.
Explanation: The background of the Barron vs Baltimore case was a law suit filed by John Barron against the city of Baltimore. He claimed that Baltimore city had possessed his private property without any proper compensation. According to Bill of Rights he filed this law suit and the court ordered city to pay Barron. But an appellate court reversed the decision. Then Baron appealed to the Supreme court.
In 1833, Supreme court gave the decision in favor of the city. The cpourt asserted that the Bill of Rights is only effective with the federal government. Because the federal government is created according to the constitution and federal government is bound to follow the constitution rules like as bill of rights.But the states government is not bound to follow the Bill of Rights.
Therefore, the answer is option B.
Answer: by Great Britain, and the Negro slave trade, Negro slavery and ... of the Industrial Revolution has been treated more or less ade- ... class in general and of those people in particular: who are re- ... it has left even upon the civilization of today have not any- ... it is not adopted as the choice over free labor; there is no choice.
yearly imports of Negroes were not large, the importation combined ... status did not result in any large-scale importation, and it was not until 1753 that the foreign trade in slaves became very large. In 1790 ... in 1850 and 1860 than they were in earlier years. ... fifties it is fairly certain that no slave holders but those few whose.
Explanation:
Answer:
So the citizens of the government are able to petition for change.
Explanation:
Without the ability to petition the government for change, many things in modern America would be different, for example, women's rights would still be little to none compared to men's.
B compass would make the most sense