Answer: B
Explanation:
When I write a story, I want an emotion. If anything, I want to hurt my readers. I write such tales with "heroic" characters that I end up showing their backstory out of order.
I start from the prettiest and shiniest parts of his story, to finally, the beginning where it shows his roughest and grittiest side. With this idea, I give the impression of a good man, but when I show his gritty and bad side, it will probably make the reader feel betrayed. Like they thought they knew him but they really didn't
Now, if I were to show his backstory in order, we get a generally normal reaction. A man commiting crime turns good and starts fighting crime.
Any multiple choice answers
4) a question with more than one answer! :D
cause-and-effect reasoning is mostly persuasive as it helps answer the question on <em>'how' </em> <em>one person, thing, or event causing another thing or event to occur </em> or <em>'why' something happens </em>making a statement objective and rational rather than a blind assertion/affirmation.
Hope this answer helps you, have a great day!
The word "absurdity” in the poem suggests that poets risk looking like fools if readers do not understand their work. hence, Option A is the correct statement.
<h3>What is the meaning of "constantly risking absurdity"?</h3>
The phrase “Constantly Risking Absurdity” compares the poet's procedure to that of a tightrope walker. Like an acrobat, the speaker says, a poet has to take probabilities and threat failure so one can acquire something worthwhile.
The word "absurdity” in the poem suggests that poets risk looking like fools if readers do not understand their work. hence, Option A is the correct statement.
Learn more about Constantly Risking Absurdity:
brainly.com/question/1760049
#SPJ1
