Answer:
Option C is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
The third one is right because the null hypothesis implies with all therapies, identical percent of kids suffer, and that simply means that there really is no distinction in drug therapies.
So, it defines the probabilities among both treated groups unless there was really no variation among drug therapies.
Due to the following reasons it describes that the following option is correct according to the statement.
Answer: b
Step-by-step explanation:
<h2>
Answer: 4/11</h2><h2>
_____________________________________</h2><h3>Sweetheart, all you need to do is reduce the expression, if possible, by cancelling the common factors to get your answer!</h3><h3>Exact Form:</h3><h3>14/11</h3><h3>Decimal Form:</h3><h3>1.¯¯¯¯27</h3><h3>Mixed Number Form:</h3><h3>1 3/11</h3><h2>
_____________________________________</h2>
Hope you have a good day!〜
Also please tell me if I'm wrong or not...
<em>Also also if I'm right can I please have Brainliest?</em>
First lets convert 24 ft into inches. Each foot has 12 inches so 24*12 equals 288. Now we have to see which one is greater 288 inches or 324 inches. 324 inches is greater so therefore 324 inches is greater than 24 ft
Step-by-step explanation:
I am not sure I fully understand what your teacher wants from you, but I would say we only need to define the burning rate per hour for both people, and with that normed rate (number / hour) we can answer the main question directly.
Thomas burned 675 cal/ 2 hours.
by dividing to and bottom by 2 (it is important to do the same action on the top and the bottom to keep the value of the ratio unchanged) we get
337.5 cal / hour
and Marvin burned 1035 cal / 3 hours.
so, the same trick, this time dividing to and bottom by 3 to norm the whole ratio to a 1 hour baseline :
345 cal / hour
so, Marvin burned more calories per hour.
