An explanation of how a value judgment would have no objective truth because there is a difference in opinion/perspective.
<h3>What is an Objective Truth?</h3>
This refers to the truth that is spoken without the <em>use of bias</em> that is accurate.
Hence, we can see that a value judgment is the assessment of a thing as being good or bad based on the standards and priority of a person.
A factual statement on the other hand is either true or false and would remain the same, irrespective of perspectives or opinions.
Read more about objective truths here:
brainly.com/question/17133736
#SPJ1
The answer is B, this is a 'compound sentence', because it contains two independent clauses: 1. Shannon read Stuart Little + and + 2. (Shannon) reported on it.
Answer:
The speaker is <u>Speculative</u>
Even though synonyms generally share the same meaning, they might not apply in the same context. So, if you want to use one specific word you should do that instead of trying to find a synonym that doesn't quite fit into the context you've established. An example is if you want to use the sentence "I was mad", meaning "I was angry", you could look for a synonym. One synonym is "absurd". However, this is a different type of mad, meaning crazy instead of meaning angry. "I was absurd" has an entirely different meaning than originally intended. This is why you should always double check the contextual meaning of the synonym you want to use.
