I'm going to assume the time period you are talking about is is right after the signing of the Magna Carta.
The three key rights in the Magna were Freedom of Speech and Expression, Freedom of The Judiciary and Political Freedom, and Physical Freedom.
The law would be more strictly enforced across a larger area, the law would become less arbitrary(right to quick, fair, and just trials), and the rulers must also be UNDER, not ABOVE the law.(The enforcement of what is written is debatable.)
The amount of free speech in the Magna was unfortunately pretty limited. Speaking against authority was forbidden and dangerous. Mostly, you were only allowed to speak against your fellow man. If a government could have people view what you were saying as dangerous, or violent revenge, your freedoms could be revoked.
Then there are Physical Freedoms. This basically declares you can't just imprison or take stuff from a random guy unless you got some good evidence and you aren't allowed to bribe people.*
*(Unless you bribe them with ALOT of money. Even today many cases are won by the richer party hiring better lawyers or throwing money at the judges, or even threats so this section of the Magna was clearly never enforced unless convenient.)
The 'bottom line' on 'Urban Plantation' theory is that _________________ populations were aggressively courted through promises and the granting of favors to keep them so dependent that they would retain and keep the Democrat-run 'machines' in power.
a.
immigrant
b.
minority
c.
poor
d.
all of the above
A…….
<span>Well,
slavery, amongst European colonial powers, came into being because of
the establishment of settlements and colonies in the New World/Americas.
The sicknesses & illnesses the Europeans brought to the Americas
nearly wiped out the native residents, leaving little to no indigenous
populous. Also, the natural friction between the locals and colonisers
would've resulted in an obvious lack of cooperation and colonisers were
never sent over in huge numbers, resulting in limited manpower. So,
slavery was a way of providing a cheap labour & workforce in the new
territories without having to resettle entire European populations. The
colonisers ran the colonies and established settlements while the
slaves effectively built them and their economies.
</span>
By 1820, this compromise<span> had been realized as two bills were passed. The first made Maine the 23rd state. The second admitted </span>Missouri<span> as a slave state and set the parallel 36°30' as the dividing line between enslaved and free states as the country continued to expand. This </span>compromise<span> was </span>successful<span>.</span>