Answer: There is one man at the head of both regimes, but there is an ideological difference.
Explanation:
Both systems of government are characterized by the fact that there is one man at the head of the state who is the supreme political authority. Yet fascism is a rigid form of nationalist rule that has historically opposed dissidents by militant methods. Communism, on the other hand, is a milder form of government compared to fascism. Fascism is based on militant nationalism, while communism is based on patriotism.
Without giving us the passage you have in front of you, maybe you can figure it out on your own (or perhaps already did). Which of the themes is evident in the passage you're looking at?
The rise of McCarthyism: Senator Joseph McCarthy led a vigorous campaign to root out all persons that had any suspicion of being communist sympathizers.
The elimination of the House Un-American Activities Committee: That was part of the backlash against McCarthyism, seeing that McCarthy and others had gone to far in their anti-communism crusade.
Opposition to Republicans supporting the Korean War: Though Truman's actions to get involve the United States in the war in Korean were initially popular, that popularity began to dwindle once China entered into the conflict and it became apparent this was going to be a protracted and difficult struggle.
The Truman Doctrine was first stated by the president to Congress in 1947, saying: "I<span>t must be the policy of the United States to support free people who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures." Essentially, the Truman Doctrine pledged American effort elsewhere in the world to check the spread of communist and Soviet influence. The policy was first put into action in 1948 by providing economic support to Greece and Turkey to stave off communist movement in those countries.</span>
Answer:
bill of rights is the answer to that question
Answer:
The Judicial branch
Explanation:
Judicial Branch Powers: The Legal branch can proclaim demonstrations of the President illegally, which eliminates them from the law. The Judicial branch can likewise pronounce laws passed by Congress to be illegal in entire or to some extent.
It prevented the federal government's choice to stop making treaties and allowed it to continue passing the laws to carry out its Native American policies
