Carlos is correct
Since we don't know the length of sides PR and XZ, the triangles can't be congruent by the SSS theorem or the SAS theorem, and since we don't know the measure of angles Y and Q, the triangles can't be congruent by the ASA theorem, the SAS theorem or the AAS theorem. Therefore, Carlos is correct.
Carlos is correct. Since the angles P and X are not included between PQ and RQ and XY and YZ, the SAS postulate cannot be used, since it states that the angle must be included between the sides. Unlike with ASA, where there is the AAS theorem for non-included sides, there is not SSA theorem for non-included angles, so the triangles cannot be proven to be congruent.
Answer:
24
Step-by-step explanation:
there are six sides of a dice, numbered one through six. 5 and 6 are greater than four, so there is a 2/6 chance that you will roll a number greater than 4, or 1/3. multiply 72 times 1/3 and that equals 24. 24 out of the 72 (24/72 = 1/3)times is how much you could expect to get a number greater than 4.
Answer:
7th Step: Preparing financials
5th Step: Preparing Adjust Entries
6th Step: Creating an adjusted trial balance
Answer:
126.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is the number of combinations of 4 cards from 9 cards:
= 9C4
= 9! / 4! 5!.
A quick way of calculating this is
9*8*7*6
----------- = 9*2*7 = 126 combinations.
4*3*2*1
