Answer:
the American they didn't want them having to much power
My respond to this question is yes
Answer: (I've copy and pasted my old work of the independence)
All men are made equivalent and there are sure unalienable rights that legislatures ought to never disregard. These rights incorporate the privilege to life, freedom and the quest for satisfaction. At the point when an administration neglects to ensure those rights, it isn't just the right, yet additionally the obligation of individuals to oust that administration. In its place, individuals ought to set up an administration that is intended to secure those rights. Governments are once in a while toppled, and ought not be ousted for paltry reasons. For this situation, a long history of misuses has driven the pilgrims to oust an oppressive government.
The King of Great Britain, George III, is liable of 27 explicit maltreatments. The King meddled with the homesteaders' entitlement to self-government and for a reasonable legal framework. Acting with Parliament, the King additionally established enactment that influenced the states without their assent. This enactment required charges on the pioneers. It likewise expected them to quarter British troopers, taken out their entitlement to preliminary by jury, and kept them from exchanging openly. Moreover, the King and Parliament are liable of through and through demolition of American life and property by their refusal to secure the settlements' fringes, their seizure of American boats adrift, and their aim to enlist unfamiliar hired soldiers to battle against the pioneers.
-good enough??
Answer:
The Gadsden Purchase
Explanation:
It later became part of New Mexico and Arizona
